Congressman Levin Joins Global Remembrance

Of Holodomor Murders in Ukrainian Parliament

The global community witnessed in recent days mournful commemorations of the 85th anniversary of Russia’s murder of 7-10 million Ukrainian men, women and children for the simple reason that they were Ukrainians and the Kremlin wanted Ukraine – the infamous, genocidal Holodomor.
Ukrainian communities around the world, in old settlements and new ones, bowed their heads and lit candles in memory of the victims.
The principal observance was held yesterday in the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, with Ukrainian community representatives from around the world in attendance.
The keynoter was Rep. Sandy Levin (D-MI), a longtime staunch advocate of Ukraine and its independence and sovereignty against Russian aggression. Levin is a co-founder and co-chair of the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus. He authored legislation that facilitated the creation of the Holodomor Memorial in Washington, D.C. near the U.S. Capitol. He is the lead sponsor of H.Res.931, which raises awareness of the Holodomor.

Congressmen Levin’s statement follows:

Many decades ago, when I was at college, I read a book about the Soviet Union. I found the book an overall exoneration of the Soviet Union’s lack of democracy and its embrace of authoritarianism.

What literally jumped off the page for me was treatment of a subject that was new to me—the famine of 1932-33 in Ukraine. The author claimed that the stories of the famine were exaggerated – suggesting that there were “many fewer millions” of lives lost than had been said by others. This dangerously dismissive and insensitive language stayed etched in my memory throughout the years.

It stayed with me as part of a Congressional delegation visiting Sarajevo, Serbia and Croatia and meeting with President Slobodan Milosevic.

It stayed with me when Elie Wiesel urged President Clinton not to forget Bosnia.

In 1992, my Congressional district included an area with a large Ukrainian American community. The relationships that I developed and the conversations that we engaged in on a wide range of issues over two decades were vital to my work in Congress.

What ensued was the formation of the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus in 1997. It allowed Members of Congress from around the country with a special interest in Ukraine to join together and work together on issues important to Ukraine and the Ukrainian-American relationship.

I remember vividly joining the protest at the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington during the Orange Revolution, when the government then in power overturned the democratic vote in Ukraine. It also was a remarkable experience to join the protest rally outside the Ukrainian Cultural Center in Warren, MI during the Revolution of Dignity, the fifth anniversary of which also is being acknowledged these days.

Those experiences and many others that I shared with the Ukrainian American community over these past four decades  inspired me to introduce the resolution in Congress—a long effort—that led to the building of the magnificent monument to Holodomor in Washington. This touching monument located so prominently near the United States Capitol is an important acknowledgement of this terrible stain in global history and a vital learning experience for generations to come.

Holodomor is a reminder of the value of democracy. The truth about the famine was suppressed by the totalitarian Soviet regime. One of the advantages of democracy is that there are more ways for the truth to be brought out, and fewer barriers to overcome. Holodomor is both a cry for freedom and a cry against authoritarianism.

As Winston Churchill said, “No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise.” He went on to say that “Democracy is the worst form of government but it’s better than all other forms.” Democracy can sure be very messy, but its goal can be far better than a worst form of government.

Today, there is a dangerous tilt to authoritarianism in many places around the world. This makes Ukraine’s struggle to resist aggression, safeguard its independence, and develop democracy all the more important. Holodomor was a weapon of a dictator against the Ukrainian people; such a tragedy should deepen our determination to fight for freedom and democracy, rather than make heroes out of dictators. Ukraine has witnessed firsthand that the challenges of democracy are not easily overcome. That makes it all the more important to overcome the threats to democracy, such as injustice and corruption. The United States must support Ukraine in its efforts.

It was deeply painful but essential to read the stories in Anne Applebaum’s new book Red Famine—Stalin’s War on Ukraine. She told how Ukrainian peasants were forced “to make a fatal choice. They could give up their grain reserves and die of starvation or they could keep some grain reserves hidden and risk arrest, execution, or the confiscation of their food—after which they would also die of starvation.”

She described this poignant memory of one person: “The mothers with babies in their arms made the strongest impression... I remember seeing one such mother who looked more like a shadow than a human being. She was standing by the side of the road, and her little skeleton of a child, instead of suckling her mother’s empty breast, sucked its own small knuckles thinly covered with translucent skin. I have no idea how many of the unfortunates I saw managed to survive. Every morning on my way to work I saw bodies on the pavements, in ditches, under a bush or a tree, which were later carried away.”

Personal stories must be recounted and remembered. A genocide, if not clearly told, can facilitate another.

I would like to acknowledge Borys Potapenko, a Ukrainian American community leader with whom I have worked for nearly 40 years and who did so much to make this visit possible.

I am very grateful to all of you for inviting me to share this commemoration of Holodomor with the hope that it can and will lead to a more humane and just society and world.

My budama pamya tatay!

Scroll down for more blogs on Ukraine and Russian imperialism.

UN Again Condemns Russian Seizure of Crimea,

Urges World to Call Ukrainian Peninsula ‘Occupied’

The United Nations again severely condemned Russia for its illegal seizure of the Ukrainian Crimean peninsula and insisted that Moscow must return it to Ukraine.

UN General Assembly’s 3rd Committee reaffirmed today, November 15, that Crimea is temporarily occupied by Russia and asserts “that the seizure of Crimea by force is illegal and a violation of international law, and affirming also that those territories must be returned.”

The document was backed by 67 UN member-states, 26 voted against it, 82 abstained. The following Russian minions voted against: Armenia, Belarus, Bolivia, Burundi, Cambodia, China, Cuba, North Korea, Eritrea, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nicaragua, the Russian Federation, Serbia, South Africa, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tajikistan, Uganda, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe.

According to UNIAN, the Permanent Mission of Ukraine to the United Nations reported that the statement also condemned politically motivated persecutions of citizens of Ukraine and called on Russia to free all Ukrainians who are illegally detained in the occupied Crimea and Russian territory. Illegally imprisoned Ukrainian film director Oleh Sentsov, Crimean activist Volodymyr Balkuh and Crimean Tatars’ human rights activist Emir-Huseyn Kuku are designated as political prisoners.

The UN General Assembly’s draft resolution also condemned the “imposition of automatic Russian citizenship on protected persons in Crimea, which is contrary to international humanitarian law,” and called on Russia “to end the practice of compelling Crimean residents to serve in the armed or auxiliary forces of the Russian Federation, including through pressure or propaganda, and in particular ensure that Crimean residents are not compelled to participate in military operations of the Russian Federation,” as well as in “illegal election campaigns.”

It also calls the Russian Federation "to monitor and accommodate the medical needs of all Ukrainian citizens unlawfully detained for the exercise of their human rights and fundamental freedoms, including political prisoners, in Crimea and the Russian Federation and allow the monitoring of those detainees' state of health and conditions of detention by independent international monitors and physicians from reputable international health organizations, including the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the International Committee of the Red Cross."

The resolution urges Russia to refrain from criminalizing the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the rights to peaceful assembly in Crimea, as well as to stop discrimination against those who do not recognize the Russian occupation of Crimea.

The document calls upon all international organizations and specialized agencies of the United Nations system, when referring to Crimea in their official documents, communications and publications, including with regard to statistical data of the Russian Federation, to refer to “the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Ukraine, temporarily occupied by the Russian Federation,” and encourages all States and other international organizations to do the same.

After this decision at the committee’s meeting, the draft resolution will be ultimately considered in December.

The first wording of the resolution on human rights in Russian-occupied Crimea was considered in December 2016. It was supported by 70 countries, 77 Russian minions abstained and 26 voted against it. On December 19, 2017, the UN General Assembly approved its amended version with 70 countries for it and 26 minions against, while 76 abstained.

Will Russia take this UN resolution to heart and heed its recommendations or will it reject it as it has rejected all UN’s decisions. Sadly, the answer is obvious to all observers.

Scroll down for more blogs on Ukraine and Russian imperialism.

Holodomor: 7-10 Million Ukrainians

Starved to Death by Stalin’s Russia

As Ukrainians around the world solemnly commemorate the 85th anniversary of Russia’s mass murder by starvation of 7-10 million Ukrainian men, women and children, it’s worthwhile to dust off my earlier blog about a United Nations’ decision about famine as a crime against humanity.

The global body had made a significant admission and denunciation about using – or abusing – food as a weapon of mass destruction though it didn’t pertain specifically to the Holodomor.

As I had written, the UN issued a statement on Monday, October 23, 2017, in which it said famine can constitute a war crime or crime against humanity. An independent UN human rights expert had noted that more civilians die from hunger and disease related to conflicts than in direct combat.

“If the famine comes from deliberate action of the state or other players using food as a weapon of war, it is an international crime,” Hilal Elver, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to food, was quoted as having told journalists in New York.

“It is crucial that the international community understands that it is an international crime to intentionally block access to food, food aid, and to destroy production of food,” Elver emphasized.

So what’s holding back the United Nations from taking the leap from stating that famine is a crime against humanity to declaring that the Ukrainian Holodomor is a crime of genocide? Fear of Russia?

Ukraine, the United States, former captive nations and others for a total of 22 countries have recognized the Ukrainian famine killings as genocide.

Earlier this fall, the US Senate adopted resolution S-435 that is to serve as “a reminder of repressive Soviet policies against the people of Ukraine.” The resolution stated that in 1932-33, “millions of Ukrainian people perished at the will of the totalitarian Stalinist government of the former Soviet Union, which perpetrated a premeditated famine in Ukraine in an effort to break the nation’s resistance to collectivization and communist occupation.”

“Whereas, with the dissolution of the Soviet Union, archival documents became available that confirmed the deliberate and premeditated deadly nature of the famine, and that exposed the atrocities committed by the Soviet government against the Ukrainian people,” the senators stated.

The resolution also cited Raphael Lemkin, who developed legal concepts and norms for containing mass atrocities and who tirelessly advocated and ultimately swayed the United Nations in 1948 to adopt the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. He wrote an essay in 1953 titled, “Soviet Genocide in [the] Ukraine,” which highlighted the “classic example of Soviet genocide,” characterizing it “not simply a case of mass murder [, but as] a case of genocide, of destruction, not of individuals only, but of a culture and a nation.”

The Senate resolution includes these two salient condemnations of the Soviet Russian persecution of Ukraine and Ukrainians: the systematic violations of human rights, including the freedom of self-determination and freedom of speech, of the Ukrainian people by the Soviet government; and the recognition of the findings of the Commission on the Ukraine Famine as submitted to Congress on April 22, 1988, including that “Joseph Stalin and those around him committed genocide against the Ukrainians in 1932–1933.”

An epic indictment of the Stalin chapter of Russian history.

Eight and a half decades ago, the Holodomor against the Ukrainian nation was triggered by an intentional, deliberate deprivation of food by Russia. Moscow was fulfilling its plan to eradicate the Ukrainian nation from the face of the earth. It wasn’t merely Josef Stalin or Soviet Russia or Communist Russia. It was singular Russia, regardless of its socio-political mantra, which for more than 1,000 bloody years has tried to subjugate or eradicate the Ukrainian nation.

Indeed, the famine murders in Ukraine of 1932-33 were the fulfillment of the imperial spirit and mission of Russia. Stalin and the Communist Party of the USSR were merely the perpetrators of record at that time. They were crimes against humanity, a war crime and an act of genocide.

Noted Holodomor researcher Robert Conquest, author of The Harvest of Sorrow, emphatically stated that the famine was a deliberate act of mass murder, if not genocide.

Anne Applebaum gave renewed impetus to the Holodomor awareness campaign. With her book “Red Famine – Stalin’s War on Ukraine” and speaking tour, Applebaum brought the story of the Ukrainian famine to the man and women in the street across the US. Fortunately, the media that covered her presentations noted that Russia’s crime was a genocide, using that designation interchangeably with famine and Holodomor.

As Applebaum spoke across the country, she reflected on the long-lasting ramifications of the Holodomor, saying that the genocide continues to shape the thinking of Ukrainians and Russians to this day, and offered examples of how contemporary political problems in Ukraine can be traced directly to both the loss of the patriotic post-revolutionary elite and the men and women who died as a result of the genocide.

Indeed, today Russia behaves toward Ukraine as it has always done. If Ukrainians can’t be cajoled or charmed into submission then they must be annihilated, which is the goal of the Russo-Ukraine War of 2014-18.

In New York metropolitan region, the Ukrainian American community and supporters will hold the annual Holodomor Commemoration at St. Patrick’s Cathedral on Saturday, November 17, at 4 pm.

Never Forget – Never Forgive!

Scroll down for more blogs on Ukraine and Russian imperialism.

Free World must Condemn and Reject

Russian Elections in Occupied eastern Ukraine

The free world must categorically condemn and reject Russia’s contrived elections in occupied eastern Ukraine, which would turn the region into Vichy Ukraine.

The Kremlin elections in occupied Donbas are being seen as a Russian gambit to weaken and fragment Ukraine and make it ripe for re-subjugation by Russia.

In a telephone press conference a couple of days ago, Special Representative for Ukraine Negotiations Kurt Volker called on Russia to halt the sham elections.

“We believe that the entities themselves do not have legitimacy in the local area, nor are they consistent with the Minsk agreements themselves. They don’t exist in the Minsk agreements, and in fact the implementation of the Minsk agreements calls for the restoration of Ukraine’s constitutional order and there is no place for these Republics in the Ukrainian constitutional orders either,” Volker said.

The US official said Washington supports elections but they must be part of the so-called Minsk process and he insisted that they must be held in accordance with Ukrainian laws.

“So the elections being held, that Russia is organizing for November 11 (tomorrow) are wholly illegitimate. We urge that they be stopped and there is no way that anyone from Europe, the United States, et cetera, can give any recognition to the results of such elections,” Volker declared.

His message must be repeated by all governments and global institutions like the UN, NATO and the European Union.

Volker further pointed out that Russia and not its mercenary-terrorists is in control of virtually everything in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts.

“What is notable here is that we have said for a long time that Russia has 100% command and control of what is happening in the occupied areas there – military forces, political entities, and direct economic activity. This is the first step taken in the form of sanctions that explicitly recognizes or explicitly is based on the notion that Russia actually controls the Donbas and eastern Ukraine,” he said.

Last week, the US Treasury Department placed additional sanctions on Moscow for its continuing occupation of Crimea and its war in eastern Ukraine. Two Russian individuals and a business entity were sanctioned for “serious human rights abuses.” Eight Russian entities, some of them hotel complexes near the Black Sea resort of Yalta, and one individual were sanctioned for “advancing Russian interests in Crimea.”

Shortly after the Treasury Department announcement, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko posted a message on his Facebook page saying the new round of sanctions were a “clear message that all those involved in the illegal occupation of the Ukrainian peninsula and hybrid aggression in Donbas will not avoid responsibility.”

The European Commission joined growing denunciations of the Russian elections. High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the European Commission Federica Mogherini said the European Union condemns the so-called “elections” and considers them as illegal.

“The EU considers the ‘elections’ planned for 11 November 2018 in the non-government controlled territories of the so-called ‘Luhansk People's Republic’ and ‘Donetsk People’s Republic’ as illegal and illegitimate and will not recognize them. The EU condemns these ‘elections,’ as they are in breach of international law, undermine the commitments taken under the Minsk agreements and violate Ukraine’s sovereignty and law. The Minsk agreements exclusively provide for local elections to be held within the framework of the Ukrainian legislation and under the OSCE standards and observation,” Mogherini said.

Ukrainian Minister of Foreign Affairs Pavlo Klimkin pointed out that Russia is making plans to rebuild its prison of nations and needs fake elections in occupied Donbas to fragment and weaken Ukraine.

“Russians already have occupying administrations that are responsible for everything, relying on military force, military and hybrid aggression against Ukraine,” Klimkin told journalists, according to an UNIAN correspondent. He added that it is pointless for anybody but Russia to hold another sham “elections” in Donbas.

“Since Russia’s entire idea is not only to stop worrying about Donbas, but to forget about it at all. The whole idea is to abuse Donbas to destabilize Ukraine, legitimize the Russian occupation of Donbas, and return it to Ukraine as a kind of a ‘Trojan horse’ to fragment Ukraine, weaken Ukraine, and so that there is no independent, free, democratic and European Ukraine,” the Ukrainian official emphasized.

Echoing Poroshenko’s statement that local Russian secessionist-proxies will be held responsible for holding these elections, Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Oleksandr Turchynov also said everyone who chooses to participate in fake and illicit events related to the so-called “elections” in Russian-occupied Donbas will bear inescapable responsibility.

“The law enforcement agencies of Ukraine will identify all the organizers and participants in those pseudo-elections, and they will inevitably be prosecuted,” the NSDC’s press service quoted Turchynov as saying.

According to him, these criminal acts condemned by all leading nations “are a gross violation and a total discredit of the Minsk peace agreements, as well as the Russian aggressor’s attempt to strengthen its control over the occupied territory.”

There is no realistic way to halt this latest Russian attempt to destroy Ukraine but nonetheless the international community must continue to press with its condemnation of Moscow’s effort to do so.

From a local, American perspective, US senators and representatives and the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus must join the denunciation campaign and threaten Russia with further steps that will isolate it – no, ban it – from the international community.

Anything less, will mean recognizing Vichy Ukraine.

Scroll down for more blogs on Ukraine and Russian imperialism.

Walesa Calls for Global Coalition to Subdue Russian Aggression

Lech Walesa, the inspirational leader of the historic Polish Solidarity movement (Solidarność) and former president of Poland, believes that only a strong, global coalition can subdue belligerent, undemocratic Russia.

Walesa told RFE/RL that a united international movement, akin to Poland’s Solidarity, is urgently needed now to respond unequivocally to Moscow’s aggression.

Furthermore, he opined, nearly five years after Russia invaded and occupied the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea, a worldwide “Solidarity for Ukraine” campaign should be launched to help liberate the region of Russian invaders and keep Moscow at bay.

Undeniably, Walesa’s words are timely today as Russia continues to spread its menacing tentacles not only in Ukraine but its hazardous impact is also being felt across Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Leaders of the former captive nations are on record as warning the international community about Russian subjugation.

Since the start of the Russo-Ukraine War of 2014-18, the former captive nations have steadfastly defended Ukraine against the Russian invasion and warned that Russia’s appetite for conquest will not abate unless it is forced to do so. They have also cautioned the free world against betraying Ukraine for the sake of an ersatz greater good. For example, they rightly fear that including Russia in the anti-ISIS coalition could compel the free world to halt sanctions against Russia, which would unleash a major backlash against it.

Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite had observed that the former captive nations’ shared goal of a secure and economically strong region can only achieve collectively. “We will only achieve this goal by standing together in the implementation of long-term collective defense measures and strategic projects aimed at ensuring the region’s energy self-sufficiency,” she said.

Grybauskaite, a staunch defender of Ukraine and outspoken opponent of Russian hostility, elaborated: “Russia is at war against Ukraine and that is against a country which wants to be part of Europe. Russia is practically in war against Europe,” she said, adding that she is prepared to “take up arms” in the instance of Russian attacks.

Grybauskaite is convinced that if Russia is not repulsed from Ukraine, Putin will sweep across the Baltics, central Europe and northern Europe. So how to dislodge Russia from Ukraine?

“The situation is still deteriorating. Russian troops are still on the territory of Ukraine. That means that Europe and the world are allowing Russia to be a country which is not only threatening its neighbors but is also organizing a war against its neighbors. It is the same international terrorism as we have in Iraq and Syria,” she said.

Linas Linkevičius, Lithuanian minister of foreign affairs, another candid critic of the free world’s political myopia, in an article in EurActiv, chastised the free world for paying too much attention to placating Russia. Linkevičius warned about the dangers of acting in a “pragmatic and responsible manner” with Russia.

The Lithuanian official recalled that at the 2008 NATO-Russia Summit in Bucharest, Russian President Putin urged the West not to cooperate with Ukraine, claiming that the country is an artificial creation, rather than a state. “That seemed to have set off an alarm clock. However, it was not heard, or the West comfortably chose not to hear it. Ukraine experienced the impact six years later, while Georgia witnessed warfare on its territory soon after, in August,” he wrote.

As Walesa cautioned against Russia, he also told RFE/RL that Western powers need to understand that Russia is a country that “used to be a super power,” but has lost that position. Consequently, it is struggling to cope with its inferior standing.

“It is important to remember that there has been never been democracy in Russia. It has always been ruled by using the threat of an enemy to sustain unity,” Walesa said. “Russia even used to invent enemies to preserve its unity.”

Walesa told RFE/RL that he thinks President Vladimir Putin made a “huge mistake” when the Russian military invaded and occupied Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in early 2014.

“In the 21st century, this is not a proper way of resolving disputes,” Walesa said. “There might be attempts to use those old methods, but it will be very costly” in the end. Ultimately, he said, what matters is the price a country has to pay for such aggression.

Wrongly or not, Walesa advised that open and democratic means could have been used to resolve the Crimean and other international issues that would have yielded better results. He added that sooner or later Putin would abandon his Crimean dream as other foreign policy pundits have suggested. “The sooner he realizes that, the less the costs he has to bear will be,” he said.

However, Walesa, framing his coalition concept, insisted that confronting and working with Russia now requires “solidarity” among countries. He said the international community should respond to Russia’s seizure and annexation of Crimea by mobilizing countries in a “solidarity for Ukraine” group.

“You chose 10 representatives from all over the world, people who are well informed about Ukraine and Russia,” he expanded about his coalition. “You can allocate them either through NATO or the United Nations.”

Suggesting a variation to typical anti-Russian sanctions, Walesa continued “Let that group of 10 people prepare 10 different propositions for different countries to choose that can hurt Russia. Something not to buy, something not to sell.... Every country has different interests, so each country could pick something from the list.”

Walesa next proposed an option similar to a good cop-bad cop routine: “It would be great to have five people within this group who have good relations with Putin. Every day, one of those five people could call Putin and tell him, ‘Listen, Putin, we have lost so much. How much have you lost?’”

“The last person who calls him should tell him, ‘Let’s sum up the losses and let’s think again, because your own oligarchs will never forgive you,’” Walesa said.

Concluding that nowadays each country is mistakenly acting in its own manner for its own interests rather than in unison, Walesa pronounced “You can’t win against Russia in such a way.”

It is questionable whether Putin could be swayed by a soft spoken discussion on any subject, but Walesa’s point about a coalition against Russia is well taken.

In view of the raging Russo-Ukraine War of 2014-18, the joint defense concept charted by Stepan Bandera and Jaroslaw Stetzko seven decades ago is worthy of a revival. The former captive nations have already made individual and collective political declarations and expressed a willingness that could lead to the successful resuscitation of such a structure. The reestablishment of the historic anti-Russian defense alliance, the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations, is well within reason especially because of the free world’s stumbling approach to defending former captive nations’ independence and sovereignty.

Not surprisingly, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin had also alluded to the necessity of such a far-reaching coalition. Outraged by the Russian invasion of his homeland, Klimkin suggested the creation of what he had called a Coalition of Freedom to defend democracy and Western values in a troubled world.

“It is about security for everyone,” said Klimkin during an exclusive Fox News interview on the eve of the 65th UN General Assembly. “If someone in this interchangeable and intertwined world cannot feel secure, how can US citizens here feel secure?”

Klimkin explained that Ukraine is confronting a threat any nation can face, adding “we need a network of security.” His Coalition of Freedom would consist of “countries which are committed to freedom, to democratic values, where we are not talking about spheres of influence, but the values and real interests of democratic countries.”

What Ukraine and the former captive nations have experienced in the Russian prison of nations has convinced them that Russia can’t be trusted today. The former captive nations must convince Washington, the other capitals and Russia that they will unite in a bloc or coalition, arm themselves and build ramparts against Russia if their common predicament is not remedied.

Countries from Georgia, to Ukraine, the Baltics, Poland and beyond would do well to form a global, UN, regional, academic, military, and NGO coalition to defend their statehood, democracy, liberty and human rights as a bulwark against Russian aggression.

With everyone in agreement, what remains is for a standard bearer to galvanize the coalition.

Scroll down to read additional blogs.

EU8 Condemn Russian Occupation of Ukraine

Following up on yesterday’s post regarding Ambassador Volodymyr Yelchenko’s address at the UN Security Council meeting, I am providing the full text of the EU8 members’ joint statement on Ukraine. Yelchenko alluded to this statement in his remarks.

In it, the European countries expressed their support for the independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine and protested Russia’s plan to hold elections in the occupied regions of Donetsk and Luhansk.

EU8 Members Joint Statement on Ukraine

Joint EU8 statement on Ukraine, delivered by Ambassador Karen Pierce on behalf of the five EU Members of the United Nations Security Council France, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, and Italy, Belgium and Germany, as former and future EU Members of the Security Council, 30 October 2018, New York.

I would like to make the following statement today on behalf of the five EU Members of the Security Council (France, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden and the UK), and Italy, Belgium and Germany, as former and future EU Members of the Security Council, which demonstrates the continuity of the EU’s position on Ukraine.

We as Member States of the European Union fully support the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within the internationally recognized borders.

We condemn the illegitimate “elections” planned for 11 November in the non-government controlled territories of the so-called “Luhansk People’s Republic” and “Donetsk People’s Republic”. If held, these illegitimate “elections” would contravene commitments made under the Minsk agreements and violate Ukrainian law. Any such illegal elections would be incompatible with the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine.

We call on the international community to stand united in opposing these illegitimate “elections” that can only serve to undermine efforts to achieve peace in the region. We urge the separatists to abandon the plans for “elections” and call on Russia to bring its considerable influence to bear to stop the “elections” from taking place.

We welcome the renewal of the special status law in the Ukrainian Rada. We urge all sides, particularly the Russian-backed separatists, to commit to full implementation of the Minsk Agreements, beginning with a comprehensive ceasefire and withdrawal of heavy weaponry. We fully support the efforts within the Normandy format for implementing the Minsk Agreements.

We remain convinced that a peaceful resolution of the conflict is possible. Only progress on the diplomatic front will bring us to a point where legitimate and credible elections can be held in eastern Ukraine in line with the Minsk agreements. 

Russia must play its part by ending its financial and military support to the separatists and withdrawing its armed forces and military equipment from Ukrainian territory.

We also express our concern regarding the degraded humanitarian situation in the conflict area, particularly as the winter season approaches. We also urge all parties to the conflict to re-establish full access of all international humanitarian organizations to the non-government controlled areas and to allow smooth and speedy delivery of humanitarian assistance in line with humanitarian principles and International Humanitarian Law.

Poroshenko Notes Further Isolation of Russia

As Ukrainian officials have underscored in the United Nations and elsewhere, the global community is isolating Russia from diplomatically and politically promoting its campaign to expand its occupation of Ukraine.

In Kyiv, President Petro Poroshenko noted his statement on Facebook: “The results of the UN Security Council meeting on the ‘Ukrainian issue’ obviously reaffirmed the ongoing international isolation of Moscow, which demonstrates audacious behavior and stubborn reluctance to hear the legitimate calls of the international community. An extremely illustrative and eloquent outcome of the UN Security Council meeting on the ‘Ukrainian issue’ is a strong support for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine.”

The Ukrainian president also emphasized that “The Kremlin must stop its brutal aggression in Donbas, terminate the supply of Russian weapons and technology to the occupied territory and stop the violation of the Minsk agreements. Crimea must be de-occupied, Russia’s aggressive policy in the waters of the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait is unacceptable.”

Scroll down to read yesterday’s blog about the Ukrainian statement at the Security Council meeting.

At UN Security Council, Ukrainian Ambassador Warns

Russia to Escalate Aggression without Stern Reproach

As the winds of war intensify from within the Kremlin, the United Nations had another opportunity to hear about the devastating crimes against Ukraine perpetrated by Russia and its invading army.

In a presentation at a special session on Ukraine at the UN Security Council on Tuesday, October 30, Ambassador Volodymyr Yelchenko, the permanent representative of Ukraine to the UN, warned the international community that Russia will escalate its aggression against Ukraine and perhaps other countries if its belligerence isn’t harnessed by a global campaign.

Yelchenko appealed to Security Council members not to support Russia’s intention to hold elections in its occupied oblasts of Ukraine in violation of Ukrainian and international laws.

Otherwise, he continued, the “elections may serve as a stepping-stone towards a new cycle of the Russian armed aggression.”

The Ukrainian official thanked Sweden, France, the Netherlands, Poland, the United Kingdom and the United States calling for this special Security Council session and their support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine. But he castigated Russia in no uncertain terms for its “well-documented acts against Ukraine: military aggression, occupation and attempted illegal annexation of Ukraine’s territories.”

Yelchenko likened Russia’s conduct to that of “a hardened and unrepentant criminal determined to make a mockery of a justice system.” He also accused Russia of being “hell-bent on sabotaging all genuine efforts to find a peaceful solution to the conflict and to bring peace to the war-torn regions of Donbas.”

Russia’s plans for so-called “early elections” in its occupied regions of Ukraine would be tantamount to “putting armed gangs’ leaders in seats in illegitimate representative bodies. This is nothing else but a provocation, an outrage against the Minsk agreements and Ukraine’s sovereignty,” he stated, adding that Ukraine will never recognize this Russian ruse to subjugate its land and people.

“Let me make it clear: only legitimately and lawfully elected officials can represent the local communities in Donbas, and not the Kremlin’s puppets sent from or appointed by Moscow,” Yelchenko declared.

The Ukrainian ambassador noted that while Russia insists that the Ukrainian government talk directly with the officials in Donetsk and Luhansk, in fact, there are no legitimate representatives freely elected by the people. Yelchenko emphasized that the authorities in Donetsk and Luhansk are “simply Moscow’s puppets, who are installed or removed from their positions at a whim of their Kremlin masters,” while Russia continues to exercise full political and administrative control over this territory.

“Moscow has created and supported the illegal armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk. It provides them with full-fledged political, military, and social-economic support as well as ideological guidance,” he said. “Their very existence is impossible without Russia’s direct financial aid, which amounts to $1.3 billion. The Russian Armed Forces exercise full command and control over military formations in the occupied areas of Ukraine.”

Yelchenko listed several facts about Russia’s military invasion of Eastern Ukraine and its subsequent occupation of two oblasts.

He said: “Just a few facts from the latest reports of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine. In August, its UAVs registered convoys of cargo trucks illegally crossing at night the segment of the Ukrainian-Russian state border currently controlled by the Russian side. The convoy then drove to the town of Khrustalnyi, a well-known storage of Russian heavy weapons. Later, in the same Khrustalnyi, the SMM spotted hundreds of ‘ammunition crates (some of which were assessed as new), as well as 118 crates of MLRS rockets.’ As per SMM reports, its monitors also identified four distinct electronic warfare systems (a Leer-3 RB-341V, a 1L269 Krasukha-2, a RB-109A Bylina and an anti-UAV system, Repellent-1) near non-government-controlled Chornukhyne.”

The latest Russian assault against Ukraine is developing in the Sea of Azov, which may soon become the Kremlin’s third front in the nearly five-year Russo-Ukraine War of 2014-18.

“In the last six months, the Russian Federation stopped in an abusive manner over 200 vessels bound for Ukrainian ports of Mariupol and Berdyansk. As confirmed by the OSCE SMM, these interruptions to commercial shipping caused economic and trade disruptions resulting in commercial losses for the ports employing thousands of people. Such actions of Russia are inconsistent with its obligations under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and breach the navigational rights of Ukraine and of the flag States of the stopped vessels. Vessels bound for Russian ports in the Sea of Azov have not been subjected to similarly disruptive stoppages,” Yelchenko charged.

In addition to the Kerch Strait Bridge, which was built unlawfully and unilaterally in violation of Ukraine’s rights and has become a major hindrance to international navigation, Yelchenko said Russia “also uses the Sea of Azov as an additional channel to supply its forces in Donbas with weapons from the occupied territory of Crimea. According to our information, Russia has not given up on the idea of having a land corridor to Crimea. Furthermore, the threat of a maritime assault from the Azov direction in case of a large-scale military confrontation remains a source of security destabilization in the Donetsk region.”

And then there is the peninsula of Crimea, the first Ukrainian territory that was invaded and occupied by Russia some two weeks after the conclusion of the 2014 Winter Olympics, which blindsided the world.

“In the occupied Crimea active militarization proceeds at full speed. Russia has more than doubled the strength of its military on the peninsula and continues the preparation of Crimean military infrastructure for deployment of nuclear weapons including refurbishment of Soviet-era nuclear warheads storage facilities,” he said.

“The situation with human rights in the peninsula also remains highly alarming. The OHCHR findings confirm ‘the continuing failure of the Russian Federation authorities, as the occupying power, to adequately guarantee and protect a wide range of human rights in Crimea.’”

Yelchenko also reminded the council members that more than 70 Ukrainian citizens have been detained and incarcerated in Russian Arctic penal colonies and occupied Crimea by Russian authorities under trumped-up politically motivated charges.

If that weren’t enough, Yelchenko said “this whole bleak picture would be incomplete without mentioning a massive campaign of propaganda and incitement of hatred against Ukraine and Ukrainians launched in by the Russian government. Russian state-owned media and public figures are spending hours in a prime time on the television to promote insinuations about the Ukrainian people. This has already played a significant role in the occupation of Crimea and fueling the conflict in Donbas.”

Since Russia controls the war against Ukraine, Yelchenko said the solution can only be found in Moscow. Ukraine is ready to enter into serious discussions with Russian authorities, but “Alas, such readiness is not present yet in Russia,” he pointed out disappointedly.

“As regrettable as it may be, until there is a tangible change in the Russian policy towards building genuine neighborly relations with countries around its borders based on respect of sovereignty and territorial integrity instead of creating areas of instability and waging wars, the Council will continue gathering around this table to discuss never ending follies of the Russian expansionist and aggressive policies.”

The Ukrainian ambassador concluded his remarks by echoing observations by other sage world leaders, who has said “One thing is for sure, appeasing the Kremlin and playing along will not contribute to building a more stable and safer world.”

Appeasing Russia will only lead to its bolder aggression against other countries.

The Security Council session did not only hear the Ukrainian official but it was privy to Russian clashes with the United States and European powers over the illegality of elections in Russian-occupied regions of eastern Ukraine. The UN’s political chief concurred with Ukraine and Western states that the vote would violate a 2015 accord laying out steps for settling the conflict in eastern Ukraine.

The position taken by UN political chief Rosemary DiCarlo left Russia isolated at the Security Council meeting. Western allies also blocked Russia from bringing a Luhansk separatist criminal, Olena Kravchenko, before the council to provide a briefing on the elections.

“The conflict in eastern Ukraine, now in its fifth year, remains an active threat to international peace and security,” DiCarlo said, reinforcing comments by Ukraine that Russia’s aggression in Donbas is a threat to regional and global peace and security.

Before the meeting began, a joint statement from France, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium and Germany was read outside the council chamber condemning what they called “the illegitimate ‘elections’ planned for November 11.”

The US deputy ambassador to the UN, Jonathan Cohen, later also claimed the “sham elections staged by Russia” violated the Minsk agreement, which states that elections must be held in accordance with Ukrainian law and be supervised by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

This was not the first occasion that Russia has been diplomatically reprimanded and justifiably isolated for its criminal behavior in Ukraine and elsewhere. Furthermore, the United Nations earlier had declared Russia to be an aggressor state that has invaded and occupied regions of Ukraine.

These public admonishments against Russia are worthwhile but they shouldn’t end on that note. While they serve to remind the free countries that their peace, freedom and existence are credibly endangered, they must also sound the clarion for their serious steps to subdue Russia’s wilful aggression and force it to evacuate its army and mercenaries from Ukraine.