Next They’ll be Cheering ‘For He’s a Jolly Good Fella” on Hitler’s Birthday

President Trump’s team Inside the Beltway is confused about which side United States of America is supposed to support. Or perhaps the officials never considered favoring Ukraine and President Zelenskyy on any occasion over Evil Empire called Russia and its dictator Vladimir Putin.

It defies America’s 250-year commitment to democracy and human rights. It defies the principles set down by Thomas Jefferson, Bejamin Franklin, John Adams, George Washington and the other Founding Fathers.

Recognizing a country like Russia that is led by Putin, a perpetrator of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, is a mockery of American values! The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for  Putin, and his comrade-in-crimes Maria Lvova-Belova, Russian commissioner for children’s rights, for the war crime of unlawful deportation and transfer of Ukrainian children during the Russo-Ukraine War. The warrant against Putin is the first against the leader of a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.

The United States oddly began recognizing Russia Day on June 12, 1992. This date commemorates the adoption of the Declaration of State Sovereignty of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) on June 12, 1990, a misnomer if there ever was one. The RSFSR later became the Russian Federation, which substantiates the explanation of some that a country called “Russia” doesn’t exist in any directory. You can’t point to borders of Russia like you can to Ukraine and the United States.

According to one flawed explanation, Russia Day commemorates the adoption of the Declaration of State Sovereignty of the RSFSR in 1990 – sovereignty from what, itself? – and the subsequent first free and fair elections in 1991 – yes, at the point of a bayonet. Official sources falsely claim that these events marked significant steps towards the establishment of the modern Russian Federation and the principles of independence, freedom, and the rule of law—as the handful of dissidents. The U.S. uses the bogus holiday to reaffirm its desire for peace and mutually beneficial relations with Russia. 

Regardless of the hypocrisy imbued in these words, today, Secretary of State Marco Rubio displayed macabre fawning over the Russian people on this occasion.

“On behalf of the American people, I want to congratulate the Russian people on Russia Day.

“The United States remains committed to supporting the Russian people as they continue to build on their aspirations for a brighter future. We also take this opportunity to reaffirm the United States’ desire for constructive engagement with the Russian Federation to bring about a durable peace between Russia and Ukraine. It is our hope that peace will foster more mutually beneficial relations between our countries,” Rubio said.

First of all, there is no evidence that the so-called Russian people, which are not a singular people but rather a mishmash of Euro-Asian tribes, seek a democratic Russia, which has also never existed, or oppose Russia’s war against Ukraine and the murder of innocent, unarmed Ukrainian men, women and children. They even don’t care that one million of their citizens in uniforms have been killed in their war. If they’re to convince the free world that they are different, they must renounce and denounce Putin/Russia.

Furthermore, a rabid anti-Ukrainian mentality lives in the souls and hearts of all Russians which keeps them from pushing to end the war that they again resumed.

Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha‎ castigated countries that extended good wishes to Moscow, as Rubio congratulated the Russian people on Russia Day.

No senior U.S. official before Rubio had congratulated Russia on its national day since the Kremlin began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. No other allied Western leaders have done so this year either.

Sybiha said at a meeting in Rome that it was “particularly unpleasant” for him to read “the public congratulations from certain countries to the Russian aggressor,” though he did not specifically name the countries in question.

By the way, for the diplocrats in Foggy Bottom, get your voices in tune for a hearty rendition of “For he’s a jolly good fella” on Hitler’s birthday April 20, and the establishment of the Nazi Party on February 20.

 

Trump’s Alignment with Russia is Killing Ukrainians, Prolonging War

With Ukraine valiantly defending itself against Russia’s barbaric onslaught, America’s chief executive dangerously refuses to give Ukrainian leaders, soldiers and people any credit and encouragement for surviving more than three years in the latest phase of Moscow’s war.

His flippant comments, anti-Ukrainian rhetoric, blatant vulgarity, offensive behavior and Russian preference are enough to wound the hearts and souls of every Ukrainian and Ukrainian advocate.

The acrimonious donnybrook in the Oval Office on February 28, with President Trump, chastising President Zelenskyy for defending his country, was not a one-off ambush of the Ukrainian chief executive. Since then, President Trump has on numerous occasions belittled Ukrainian battlefield achievements while solidarizing with the Russian aggressor. 

As is he has repeatedly done, when Ukraine successfully strikes back at Russia, Trump finds a way to denounce Zelenskyy for undermining peace efforts by provoking the Russians. In other words, Trump doesn’t want Ukrainian soldiers to return fire but rather to roll over and die.

The case in point was last week’s Spiderweb surprise drone attack that struck Russia’s bomber fleet. Asked by a reporter on Air Force One if the June 1 attack, which disabled or destroyed as many as 40 Russian planes, had changed his view about how many “cards” Zelensky has to play, Trump criticized Ukraine for poking the bear. “They gave Putin a reason to bomb the hell out of them,” Trump said. “That’s what I didn’t like — I saw it and thought, ‘Here we go, now there’ll be a strike.’”

Trump also claimed that Ukraine provoked the war in 2022 by fighting back against the invader.

The comment follows Trump’s assessment comparing the war in Ukraine to a schoolyard fistfight, in which, in his view, it’s best not to intervene. “It's a pretty known analogy. You have two kids, they fight, fight, fight,” Trump said during his meeting last week with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. “You try and pull them apart; they don't want to be pulled. Sometimes you’re better off letting them fight for a while.”

Trump demonstrated again that he either doesn’t know anything about Ukraine or he doesn’t care. 

In an interview with ABC, Zelenskyy resented the analogy. “We are not playing in the park with the Russians like two boys, two kids. Putin is not a kid,” Zelenskyy told ABC’s Martha Raddatz. “So, we can’t compare, and we cannot say, OK, let them fight for a while.” Zelensky said if anyone has shown no interest in ending the war, it’s Putin, who he described as a “maniac.”

“I feel strongly Putin does not want to end the war without total defeat of Ukraine,” Zelenskyy told Raddatz. “With all due respect to President Trump,” Zelensky said, “I think it’s just his personal opinion. Trust me, we understand the Russians much better, the mentality of the Russians, than the Americans understand the Russians. I know for sure Putin doesn't want to stop the war.”

Trump claimed on May 27 that Russia would already be facing serious consequences if not for his actions, following one of the most intense Russian aerial assaults on Ukraine. “What Vladimir Putin doesn’t realize is that if it weren’t for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean really bad. He's playing with fire,” he wrote on Truth Social.

Wait a second, braggadocio or not, you mean the American President is protecting Russia from being bombed by Ukrainian drones and warplanes? And then the President had an hour-long conversation with Putin in which Trump learned about the Russian dictator’s plans, which he chose not to reveal. That’s certainly not the American way; that’s certainly siding with the enemy of humanity.

Zelenskyy and five other European leaders during their recent meeting in Albania joined a conference call with President Trump immediately after his call with Vladimir Putin hoping to hear that Putin had agreed to a ceasefire — or the US would impose penalties on him for refusing to do so.

Instead, Trump said Putin had agreed to negotiate, stressed the US wouldn't be involved in those negotiations, and pushed back against the idea of imposing sanctions on Putin at the current time, two sources who were on the call and a third source briefed on the call told Axios.

Why it matters: Trump gave the impression he was getting closer to withdrawing from the issue altogether. Some leaders on the call seemed “surprised” or “shocked,” the sources said.

“I think something's going to happen. And if it doesn’t, I just back away and they’re going to have to keep going. Again, this was a European situation, and should have remained a European situation,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office several hours after his calls.

So, Trump wants to refrain from so-called European situations. History has shown that others have tried this but failed, only giving rise to greater European dictators.

As for sanctions, Trump floated the idea of imposing sanctions on Ukraine.

Trump’s envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, is another White House official who can’t say anything favorable about Kyiv. Kellogg even sympathizes with Moscow’s opposition to Ukraine’s accession to NATO. He said Russia’s concern over the eastward enlargement of NATO was fair and the United States did not want to see Ukraine in the U.S.-led military alliance.

Asked by U.S. network ABC News about a Reuters report that Russia wanted a written pledge over NATO not enlarging eastwards to include Ukraine and other former Soviet republics, Kellogg said: “It’s a fair concern.”

David Petraeus, retired United States Army general and CIA director, observed what no one in the White House will have the courage to declare: that Russia’s aim was to topple president Volodymyr Zelensky in order to “install a puppet leader and to control all of Ukraine.”

He added: “Once that's done, you are going to see them focus on one of the Baltic states. Lithuania has featured prominently in his speeches and we should have listened a lot more.”

President Volodymyr Zelensky, responding to the May 25 overnight bombardment, called for urgent new sanctions and warned that “America's silence, and the silence of others around the world, only encourages Putin.”

The European Union and US lawmakers have also called for tougher action. It seems as if the White House is the lone American institution out in the cold.

Mission that Destroyed 41 Russian Bombers was in the Planning for 18 Months

News media around the world are abuzz with reports of Ukraine’s daring and historic attack on June 1 against Russia’s five military airfields that destroyed 41 of its long-range bombers.

The operation, dubbed “Spiderweb,” was in the planning stages for 18 months and personally overseen by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and carried out by head of the Security Service of Ukraine Vasyl Malyuk, according to Ukrainian sources such as Pravda.

Ukrainian news media stated that the operation was extremely complex from a logistical point of view.

“The SBU first transported FPV drones to Russia, and later mobile wooden houses. Later, on the territory of the Russian Federation, the drones were hidden under the roofs of houses, already placed on trucks. At the right moment, the roofs of the houses were opened remotely, the drones flew to hit the Russian bombers,” the story said.

“The people who participated in this historic special operation have been in Ukraine for a long time. So, if the Putin regime demonstratively detains someone, it will be another staged performance for the domestic audience.”

The Ukrainian drone attack that destroyed more than 40 Russian military planes was carried out deep in Russia’s territory, while Russia pounded Ukraine with missiles and drones a day before the two sides meet for a new round of direct talks in Istanbul.

The drones reportedly hit 41 planes stationed at several airfields on Sunday, afternoon, June 1, including A-50, Tu-95 and Tu-22M aircraft, the official said. Moscow has previously used Tupolev Tu-95 and Tu-22 long-range bombers to launch missiles at Ukraine, while A-50s are used to coordinate targets and detect air defenses and guided missiles.

Russia’s Defense Ministry in a statement confirmed the attacks, which spanned five airfields. The FPV drones damaged aircraft and sparked fires on air bases in the Irkutsk region, more than 4,000 kilometers (2,500 miles) from Ukraine, as well as Russia’s northern Murmansk, it said. Strikes were repelled in the Amur region in Russia’s Far East and in the western regions of Ivanovo and Ryazan, the ministry said.

Nonetheless, Ukrainian officials expressed hope that negotiations on ending the three-year war can resume. The attack came the same day as Zelenskyy said Ukraine will send a delegation to Istanbul for a new round of direct peace talks with Russia on Monday. In a statement on Telegram, Zelenskyy said that Defense Minister Rustem Umerov will lead the Ukrainian delegation. “We are doing everything to protect our independence, our state and our people,” Zelenskyy said.

Meanwhile, Russia on Sunday launched the biggest number of drones — 472 — on Ukraine since the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Air Force of Ukraine said.

What is historically monumental about this attack is that Ukraine, which is honeycombed with Ukrainian traitors and Russian collaborators and provocateurs, shielded this secret from Moscow.

UN: Russia Aerial Attacks against Ukraine are Crimes Against Humanity

Russia has committed crimes against humanity by deliberately targeting civilians with drones in Ukraine’s Kherson Oblast, according to a new report by the United Nation’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine.

The commission concluded that the drone attacks, which began in July 2024, were widespread, systematic, and part of a coordinated state policy to terrorize the population and forcibly depopulate the area. The findings were based on more than 300 videos, over 600 Telegram posts, and 91 interviews with victims, witnesses, and local officials.

“The individual drone attacks amount to the war crimes of intentionally directing attacks against civilians. The recurrence of these attacks for over 10 months, against multiple civilian targets and in a wide geographic area, demonstrates that they are widespread and systematic and have been planned and organized, requiring the mobilization and allocation of necessary resources. These and other elements led the Commission to conclude that Russian armed forces carried out drone attacks targeting civilians pursuant to an organizational policy and committed murder as a crime against humanity,” the commission said in the report published on May 28.

“The Commission further found that Russian armed forces and those supporting them have committed acts or threats of violence for the primary purpose to spread terror among the civilian population in the targeted areas of Kherson Province, in violation of international humanitarian law. The nature and broad range of the attacks, their specific civilian targets, their frequency, intensity, geographic spread, the circumstances in which they occur, have led to pervasive fear within the population.”

Nearly 150 civilians have been killed and hundreds more wounded in drone strikes on Kherson city and 16 surrounding localities. Victims include men, women, and children, with many struck while going about their daily routines. Ambulances, which are protected under international law, have also been targeted, resulting in additional casualties.

European leaders have concurred that “the massive air strikes, particularly on the city of Kyiv over the weekend, do not speak the language of peace, but rather the language of a war of aggression,” calling it, “a slap in the face of all those who are trying to bring about a ceasefire in Ukraine itself, but also in Europe and the USA.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy accused Russia of stalling peace talks and said Moscow did not want to halt its three-year invasion, adding that “they will constantly look for reasons not to end the war.”

Russia Hits Ukraine with Largest Drone Attack; Trump Policy Mocked and Deemed Failure

Living up to its reputation of conducting heinous missions to destroy Ukraine, kill Ukrainians and subjugate the survivors while feigning interest in negotiations and peace, Russia launched the largest aerial attack against Ukrainians since the latest phase of the Moscow’s aggression began three years ago.

Following a week in which Moscow had already struck several Ukrainian cities, Russia launched on May 24 more than 360 drones against nearly a dozen civilian targets, mostly residential neighborhoods, killing 18 people, including three children, and wounding scores.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pointed to Washington’s reluctance to take a stronger stance against Russia’s murderous behavior as the reason for the attack. Others have opined that Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin is mocking the United States and President Trump by continuing the bombardment of Ukraine. This continuance is proof that Trump’s policy regarding Ukraine has failed, they said.

Russia stepped up missile-and-drone assaults on the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and other regions, killing at least 18 people overnight into Sunday, May 25, after President Trump last week declined to impose further sanctions on Moscow over its refusal to halt its invasion.

Russia attacked with drones and missiles – one of the largest single-night raids of the war, according to the Ukrainian Air Force – in a second consecutive day of pounding strikes that sent civilians running for shelters in the middle of the night. Officials said that children were among those killed by the strikes and that a further 60 were injured and more than 80 residential buildings damaged across the country, even as more than 300 of the missiles and drones were shot down.

According to Ukrainian officials, Russians attacked the cities of Kyiv, Kyiv, Zhytomyr, Khmelnytsky, Ternopil, Dnipropetrovsk, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Kharkiv, Chernihiv, Cherkasy, Sumy, Poltava regions.

In Ternopil, a western city less frequently targeted by Russian attacks, a Kalibr cruise missile struck an industrial facility and caused a fire, according to Governor Viacheslav Nehoda. Eye witnesses said fortunately the strike came at night thus eliminating human casualties.

Zelenskyy called for more economic sanctions against Russia to force it to stop its invasion, which Putin has refused to do despite Trump’s entreaties.

“Russia is dragging out this war and is continuing to kill on a daily basis,” Zelenskyy said on social media. “It can’t be ignored. The silence of America, the silence of others in the world, only encourages Putin.”

The attacks came in the midst of a massive POW exchange between Ukraine and Russia totaling some 1,000 soldiers.

The scale of Russia’s use of aerial weapons aside, the attacks over the past 48 hours have been among the most intense strikes on Ukraine since the February 2022 invasion. For Kyiv, the day was particularly somber as the city observes Kyiv Day, a national holiday that falls on the last Sunday of May commemorating its founding in the fifth century, making it centuries older than Moscow.

In Markhalivka, just outside Kyiv where several village homes were burned down, local residents watched their ruined home in tears. They liked their losses to images from Bakhmut and Mariupol.

Western officials renewed calls for tougher sanctions on Russia after the large-scale missile and drone attack hit Kyiv, which injured over a dozen civilians and damaged multiple residential buildings.

Moldovan President Maia Sandu has condemned a large-scale Russian attack on Ukrainian cities and villages, stating that such actions do not reflect the behavior of a country seeking peace.

“367 drones and missiles. At least 12 dead. Dozens injured. This is not the behavior of a country seeking peace – it’s a deliberate escalation and a brutal attack on innocent lives. Moldova stands with Ukraine. The world must respond with massive support for Ukraine,” Sandu said.

Kaja Kallas, high representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, called for the “strongest international pressure” on Russia after the latest large-scale attack.

Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna wrote on X: “Russia’s continued aggression has a simple explanation: it hasn’t faced enough pressure to stop. The power to change that lies with us.” He called for increased military aid, tougher sanctions, and actions targeting Russia’s shadow oil fleet and frozen assets.

EU Ambassador to Ukraine Katarina Mathernova described the assault as "another horrific missile and drone attack," noting that areas where her colleagues live had been struck. "If anyone still doubts Russia wants war to continue — read the news," she wrote.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen observed that Russia’s recent attacks on Ukraine prove that Moscow has no interest in peace. “During the day Putin talks about negotiations, then he bombs Ukraine during the night,” Frederiksen added.

Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha condemned the attack and called on the international community to further pressure Russia for a ceasefire.

“When the entire world calls for an end to the killing, Putin orders even more strikes, attacks, and murders of children. This once again emphasizes the imperative of a full, unconditional, and durable ceasefire for any meaningful peace effort,” Sybiha wrote on X. “The world must pressure Russia to accept it and put an end to the killings immediately.”

In response to the latest Russian attacks, the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) released a statement “deploring” the deadly new wave of attacks.

“With at least 78 people reported killed or injured across the country, last night’s attack tragically demonstrates the persistent deadly risk to civilians of using powerful weapons in urban areas, including those far away from the frontline,” said Danielle Bell, Head of HRMMU.

“It is yet another addition to the staggering human toll this war continues to inflict on civilians, with more families across the country now grieving their losses.”

The Armed Forces Operational Command in Poland –  a NATO nation that borders Ukraine to the west –  said in a Sunday morning post to X that its fighter jets were scrambled during the Russian attack. “Intensive activity of long-range aviation of the Russian Federation has been observed, associated with strikes carried out on objects located, among others, in the western territory of Ukraine,” the statement said.

But, after two days of intense Russian air raids that hit civilian buildings across Ukraine, there has been an only a meager response from Donald Trump. He told reporters that he doesn’t like what Putin is doing to Ukraine and that the Russian dictator is acting “crazy.”

“I’m not happy with Putin. I don’t know what's wrong with him. What the hell happened to him?” Trump said.

Congressman Don Bacon (R-NE), a moderate member of the House of Representatives, rejected the idea of peace talks with Russia following Moscow’s large-scale weekend attacks on Ukraine and called for decisive action.

Bacon, known for his pro-Ukraine stance, said, “It is a time for honesty. Peace talks are having zero effect on Putin.” He stated that the Kremlin is continuing its aggression with the aim of subjugating Ukraine and will not stop until it encounters firm resistance.

“His [Putin's – ed.] goal is to dominate Ukraine & he won’t stop until he realizes he cannot win,” the congressman added.

He urged the United States and its allies to act resolutely: “The U.S. and its allies must arm Ukraine to the teeth, sanction Russia to the max and confiscate the $300 billion in overseas Russian assets.”

The ‘Baturyn Tragedy’ – History Repeats Itself

As current bloody events are unfolding in Ukraine, it should be noted that their origins can be found not in 2022 or 2012 but rather centuries ago. Russia hasn’t transformed its inhuman, imperial ways since the earliest days of its so-called holy Russian empire as it has been drooling over the Ukrainian prize for hundreds of years.

This iteration of Russia’s invasion and war against Ukraine demonstrates that as far as wars go, this one isn’t a matter of opposing armies meeting on the battlefield in hopes of wiping each other out. In this war, Russia is hellbent on causing as much destruction to civilian structures and infrastructures as well as indiscriminate death of as many innocent Ukrainian men, women and children engaged in their regular daily activities as it can with its drones and ballistic missiles.

Perhaps you recall the coldblooded murders of civilians in Bucha at the start of the war, or the Palm Sunday attack a few weeks ago, or the deadly missile attacks this week and last as Russian officials stall and lie about starting a truce.

Killing Ukrainian civilians as it seeks to achieve its imperial mission of building a global empire is Moscow’s historical modus operandi. Killing Ukrainians is what Russians do. The irony of this is that these crimes are committed as the world watches.

To show this, I’ve gathered long-standing historical accounts of Russia’s savage siege and slaughter of Ukrainians in the town of Baturyn more than three centuries ago that caught the attention and disgust of Europeans. Nothing in Russians’ mentality has changed since then.

The ‘Baturyn Tragedy’

Baturyn, a small northern Ukrainian town of 2,500 people, looks like a village with a huge museum today. Comparable to Kyiv in the 18th century and the capital of the Ukrainian Kozak state, it never regained its previous shape after the terrible massacre of 1708. In that year, Russian forces slaughtered all the 15,000 inhabitants including women and children and burnt the town to the ground.

The tragedy not only marked the decay of the Ukrainian Kozak state and its absorption into the Russian empire. The destruction of Baturyn, the greatest military arsenal and food store in Ukraine upon which Sweden’s king relied, enabled Russia to achieve victory over Sweden in the Battle of Poltava in 1709, which changed the course of the Great Northern War and secured Russia’s place among the great powers. Today, Russian President Vladimir Putin is seeking to revive this power, cynically speaking about “unity” between Ukrainians and Russians. Thanks to the efforts of historians during the last 30 years of academic freedom, the bloody nature of this “unity” has been revealed.

During the Great Northern War (1700–21), Hetman Mazepa of Ukraine ceased to consider himself loyal to Tsar Peter I due to his deception and on November 7 (October 28) 1708, when Charles XII of Sweden was on his way to Moscow but was forced to divert his forces toward central Ukraine, Mazepa joined the Swedish advance. He was followed by about 3,000 Kozaks and leading members of the Zaporozhian Army.

However, things had worsened with the outbreak of the Great Northern War between Muscovy and the Swedish Kingdom (1700-1721). Trying to turn the Moscow tsardom into a modern empire and mobilize forces, Peter I started taking Kozak troops from Ukraine for his war, exploiting the economy of the country and concentrating power. His decree of 1707 de-facto liquidated Kozak autonomy, which Mazepa was unwilling to accept.

At this point, Mazepa allied himself with Swedish King Charles XII. This was the beginning of the tragedy of Baturyn.

For a supply purpose, Baturyn was of key importance – the Kozak capital was heavily armed with nearly 100 cannons and a 6,000-strong garrison. Mazepa had amassed a huge storage of food and gunpowder that would be enough for the entire Sweden army.

At the end of October 1708, the hetman sent a letter to Colonel Skoropadskyi of Starodub outlining the reasons that led him to conclude the Ukrainian-Swedish alliance with Charles XII:

“Moscow has long had all sorts of intentions towards us, and recently began to seize Ukrainian cities, expel from them the plundered and impoverished inhabitants, and populate them with their troops. I had a secret warning from my friends, and I can clearly see that the enemy wants to take us – the hetman, all the officers, colonels and all the military leadership – into the hands of his tyrannical captivity, eradicate the Zaporozhian name and turn everyone into dragoons and soldiers, and to subject the entire Ukrainian people to eternal slavery. I learned about this and realized that Moscow came to us not to protect us from the Swedes, but to destroy us with fire, robbery and murder. And so, with the consent of all the officers, we decided to surrender to the protection of the Swedish king in the hope that he would defend us from the Moscow tyrannical yoke and restore our freedom.”

In late October of 1708, Peter dispatched to Baturyn an entire corps of 20,000 soldiers commanded by his right-hand man Generalissimus Aleksandr Menshikov. The order was to destroy the Cossack capital and supplies there at any cost. While the Swedish army, accompanied by Mazepa, was already rushing to the city, Russians had only five days for the siege, from October 27 to the morning of 2 September 2.

Menshikov, on the eve of the storming of Baturyn, commanded 20 dragoon regiments, numbering from 15 to 20 thousand dragoons. But at that time Baturyn was a fortress, armed with a large number of guns. In view of this, Menshikov tried to persuade the defenders of the fortress to surrender, but the Baturyns not only rejected the offer of capitulation but also responded with cannon shots at Menshikov's positions. The Russian Army failed to storm the fortified city, and only after penetrating through a secret raid did the twice-superior forces of Menshikov gain the advantage and at six o'clock in the morning, November 13 (2), 1708, entered Baturyn territory and insidiously attacked the defenders of the fortress. Despite fierce opposition from the garrison, within two hours, the Russian troops completed the capture of the city. When Hetman Mazepa later saw the consequences of the Baturyn massacre in Moscow, “this spectacle struck him in the heart”; Mazepa wept zealously for Baturyn, watching how much human blood in the city and suburbs was full of puddles. 

The bloody events in Baturyn are confirmed by many documentary sources.

Mykola Markevich (1804–60) wrote: Serdyuks were partly cut out, partly tied in one crowd with ropes. Revenge for yesterday, Menshikov instructed the executioners to execute them with various executions; the army, everywhere and always ready for plunder, was scattered in the homes of the common people, and, without dismantling the innocent from the guilty, exterminated civilians, spared neither women nor children. "The most common death was to quarter the living, wheel them and put them on a stake, and then new kinds of torment were invented, it is the imagination that terrifies. 

Alexander Rigelman (1720–1789) described the events as follows:

“Menshikov received the city, people are all devoted to the sword, both in the fortress and in the suburbs, without remnants, not sparing even infants, not only the old.” 

According to the French historian Jean-Benoit Scherer (1741–1824): “The city was taken and looted. What the soldiers could not take with them was the prey of the fire, which devoured even part of the city. The fortifications were completely destroyed, and the inhabitants of the city died, subjected to the most brutal torture: some were put on stilts, others were hanged or quartered.[6]

Menshikov failed to capture the city during several attacks, but succeeded the night before Mazepa’s arrival, on September 2. It is still unclear how he could capture this heavily armed city with a quite big garrison of about 6,000 men.”

In late October of 1708, Peter dispatched to Baturyn an entire corps of 20,000 soldiers commanded by his right-hand man Generalissimus Aleksandr Menshikov. The order was to destroy the Kozak capital and supplies there at any cost. While the Swedish army, accompanied by Mazepa, was already rushing to the city, Russians had only five days for the siege, from October 27 to the morning of September 2.

Initially, Menshikov tried to persuade defenders of Baturyn but they kept their loyalty to Mazepa. According to the Moscow chronicler Ivan Zheliabuzkyi, who described the Baturyn garrison,

“He [Menshikov] sent negotiators many times demanding that the city be opened. But they didn’t listen and began to fire from artillery.”

The garrison was commanded by four Cossack colonels with the best-known Cossack infantry colonel Dmytro Chechel and artillery captain Friedriech Königseck. Born in Prussia, Königseck served with the Cossacks for many years and had an estate near Baturyn.

Menshikov failed to capture the city during several attacks, but succeeded the night before Mazepa’s arrival, on 2 September. It is still unclear how he could capture this heavily armed city with a quite big garrison of about 6,000 men.

The 19th-century Ukrainian historian Mykola Kostomarov (1817-1885) wrote about these events after thorough study of both folklore legends and written sources:

“One of the Kozak officers, Ivan Nis, came to Menshikov and showed him a secret way to get into Baturyn. Nis allegedly pointed the way in the Baturyn wall. Menshikov sent soldiers there. Simultaneously, an attack was launched from the other side.”

While exact details of how Muscovites captured the city remain unclear, the fact which all sources mention is the total massacre of almost all the 12,000-15,000 inhabitants (garrison and civilians including women, children, and infants) and the destruction of the city by fire. Only about 1,000 managed to escape.

The event was widely covered in the European press of the time, including newsletters such as the English Daily Courant, London Gazzete, French Paris Gazette, Lettres Historique, Gazette de France, and the German Wöchentliche Relation amongst others. They contained lengthy articles about Mazepa, his alliance with the Sweden king, and the destruction of Baturyn. Gazette de France wrote:

“All the inhabitants of Baturyn, regardless of age and sex, are slaughtered, accordingly to the inhuman customs of the Muscovites… The whole of Ukraine is bathed in blood.”

According to the Lyzohub Chronicle of that time, many people were burned to death in houses. According to the Swedish historian Anders Fryxell, who wrote the history of Charles XII,

“Menshikov ordered the corpses of the leading Cossacks to be tied to boards and sent floating along the Seim River so that they would give the news to others about the perdition of Baturyn.”

“Terrible massacre,” “All Ukraine in blood,” “Women and children on saber blades”—These were the headlines of the French newspapers Lettre Historique, Mercure Historique et Politique, Gazette de France and Paris Gazette in 1708.

The French were writing about the massacre in Baturyn, (a historic town in Chernihiv Oblast of northern Ukraine). Russian Tsar Peter the Great ordered the town to be razed to the ground. At the time it was the capital of renowned Ukrainian ruler Hetman Ivan Mazepa. The Russians killed between 11,000 and 15,000 civilians, children, women and the elderly.

One hundred years passed and the French had confirmation of the brutality of Russian troops, based on their own experience. In 1814, Russian troops joined allied forces invading France. Historian Henry Houssaye collected evidence of atrocities. Hundreds of eyewitnesses mentioned them :

“... Men were beaten with swords and stabbed with bayonets. Naked, bedridden, they had to be present during the violence against their wives and daughters. Others were tortured, beaten, and roasted until they opened their hiding places. Priests of Montlond and Rolampon were beaten to death on the spot… In Busy le Lon the Cossacks set fire to the legs of a servant left to guard the castle…”

The city itself was burnt entirely and quickly. Only the hetman’s archive, church bells, and some of the cannons were taken away by Muscovites while all the rest destroyed with many people burnt to death in their houses or churches where they tried to hide:

“Archaeologists studying the remains of the foundations of the hetman’s palace in the castle discovered that the fire was so intense that fragments of glass dishes had melted, and in some places the fire had even melted bricks. The massacre and destruction were so absolute that even two decades later eyewitnesses declared that ‘the city of Baturyn is entirely deserted, and everything in its bulwarks and walls has collapsed and become overgrown, and there is no new or old structure in both the castles, only two empty stone churches,’” Kovalenko wrote.

An interesting account of the aftermath of the storming of Baturyn was boastfully recorded in the diary of Peter I that Kovalenko cites:

“The city of Baturyn (where Mazepa the traitor had his residence) was taken without great losses, and we captured the foremost thieves, Colonel Chechel and the general Kozak captain, Königseck, with several of their confederates; and we killed the rest and burned down that city with everything and destroyed it to its foundations.”

Archaeological excavations in Baturyn have been conducted by Ukrainian researchers since 1995. In 2001, Canadian scientists joined them.

In 2005, the Baturyn Foundation was founded by President Victor Yushchenko and supported by several Canadian charities and academic organizations. That same year, 150 students and scientists from the Universities of Chernihiv and Nizhyn and the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy took part in the excavations, and the following year 120 students and scientists from universities and museums-reserves of Kyiv, Chernihiv, Hlukhiv, Rivne, Baturyn and the University of Graz (Austria).

In 1996–2007, archaeologists discovered 138 burials in Baturyn from the time of the reign of Mazepa, 65 of them belonging to those killed during the capture of Baturyn (mostly women, children and the elderly). Thus, in 17 of the 33 graves excavated in 2005, the skeletons of women and children were buried without a coffin or visible signs of Christian rites. 

The “Baturyn Tragedy” is the official name of the events in Baturyn, which was established by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on April 2, 2008. President Victor Yushchenko has stated: “For me, the Baturyn tragedy is associated with the Holodomor of the 1930s, and it is immoral that there is still no monument to the innocent victims.” 

On November 21, 2007, the President of Ukraine signed the Decree “On Some Issues of Development of the National Historical and Cultural Reserve” Hetman’s Capital “and the Village of Baturyn,” which provides for the construction in 2008 of the Memorial Complex in memory of victims of Baturyn. 

On November 13, 2008, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine observed a minute of silence in memory of the victims of the Baturyn tragedy. Since 2018, the Day of Remembrance of the Baturyn Tragedy (November 2, 1708) has been commemorated at the state level in Ukraine. 

It should be apparent that the Baturyn Tragedy is vital to an understanding of Ukraine-Russia history, why Ukrainians behave the way they do, and Russian hatred for Ukraine and Ukrainians.  

“An understanding of Russian imperialism in Ukraine is essential for anyone seeking to make sense of today’s war. Putin has attempted to blame the invasion on everything from nonexistent Nazis to imaginary NATO security threats, but at heart it is an old-fashioned colonial war of extermination. In words and deeds, Russia has made clear that it seeks to destroy the Ukrainian state and erase Ukrainian identity. Asking Ukrainians to negotiate with this genocidal agenda is absurd and grotesque. Instead, the goal must be a decisive Ukrainian victory over Russian imperialism. Until Europe’s longest independence struggle reaches a successful conclusion, a sustainable peace will remain elusive,” observed Peter Dickinson, editor of the Atlantic Council’s UkraineAlert service.

And, finally, as Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meier observed, “We intend to remain alive. Our neighbors want to see us dead. This is not a question that leaves much room for compromise.”

‘The West cannot Allow Ukraine to Lose’

Speech by Valerii Zaluzhnyi, ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of Ukraine to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (2021–24), delivered at the London Defense Conference on May 10, 2025. It is titled “New Security Alliances as an Alternative to the World Order of Dictatorships: The Future Belongs to Those Who Master Technology.”

It is highly symbolic to speak today, when the world should be commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of the war against fascism. Regrettably, the very country that once suffered under fascism—having appropriated the collective victory – now wages a brutal war of its own. As was the case 80 years ago, women and children are being killed, this time under the banners of propaganda. Conversely, the descendants of those who once surrendered under force are now doing everything, they can to defend the Ukrainian people. What has happened to the world?

First and foremost, I would like to express our deepest gratitude to you – our partners. Without your support  – financial, military, political, and moral – there would quite simply be no speech from me here today. Western assistance has enabled us to stand our ground. Of course, every delay has come at a high price for us. But by 2025, it has become clear that even this support is no longer sufficient. And I do not mean merely the quantity or timing of aid—though those still matter.

Today, I wish to speak about growing threats that are dismantling the global order and may soon bring every one of us to the point of needing support ourselves. These developments take place amid the war in Ukraine, where, it is clear to all, Ukrainian soldiers are fighting not only Russian forces, but also the combined resources—and now troops—of Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran.

Does it not strike you as strange that in the 21st century, exactly 80 years after the end of the bloodiest war in human history, there is a conflict raging in the very heart of Europe that has now lasted eleven years and claims more victims each day? Are you not alarmed? And what of the so-called global order—does it still exist?

Here is what the “global order” has meant for Ukraine. Try explaining it to children whose parents were killed at the front. It is impossible to explain it to parents who lost innocent sons and daughters. I can tell you what it is like to speak with mothers who do not even know where their children are, and who cling to hope for a miracle.

Let us examine what this “global order” meant for Ukraine prior to August 8, 2008. I return to that date deliberately, because it was then – when Russian missiles and shells began falling on Georgian cities – that this world order ought to have made itself known. But it remained silent, watching as one state permitted itself to kill the people of another. And what of the rules underpinning that order? The rules supposedly safeguarded by the United Nations? They, too, remained silent. Seventeen years later, in 2025, that same organization could not even officially acknowledge the daily killing of Ukrainians.

In 2014, the global order finally expressed concern. That concern culminated on February 24, 2022, when, as in 1941, new invaders launched a full-scale assault on Ukraine at 4 o’clock in the morning. Since then, Ukraine has lost tens of thousands of lives and hundreds of thousands have been wounded. Millions have lost their homes. Millions more have fled, seeking safety for their children. The occupied territories resemble apocalyptic wastelands.

Every day, the same enemy terrorizes civilians with rockets, bombs, and drones, specifically targeting women and children. Most men are at the front. This is what the global order has meant for Ukrainians: nothing. It did not exist in 2014, nor in 2022, nor today. Perhaps you believe you are more fortunate—after all, you are not Ukraine. You think it cannot happen to you. I must disappoint you. Many in Ukraine believed that, too—in 2008, and in 2014. Some of those very people, now fighting for the enemy, returned in 2022 to kill their former neighbors and relatives.

I find it especially interesting to observe those in Europe who were shocked by emotional speeches in Munich in 2025 yet were seemingly unmoved by eleven years of war next door in Ukraine.

As a result, Ukraine – excluded from the global order – has been forced to fight for the right to exist with weapons in hand, at the cost of our own people’s lives. And we will ensure that in any future global order, Ukraine is not excluded.

But that global order, as described in the works of liberal thinkers, is already gone. It collapsed under the pressure of discontent on one side, and fear and impotence on the other. Historically based on rules and the balance of power, the existing system has begun to fall apart. Rules should be enforced by the coercive capacity of global leaders—but those leaders are no longer willing or able to do so.

Rules for coexistence no longer apply. The institutions charged with enforcing them are now aligned with those who reject them.

Treaties have lost their force. The disintegration of the global security architecture calls into question the concept of international guarantees. The Budapest Memorandum is worth no more than NATO’s Article 5. The very idea of legal, diplomatic, or military security guarantees has been stripped of meaning. Ukraine’s own experience demonstrates that such guarantees no longer exist.

The old balance of power – the one we studied in our universities – has disappeared. It was not only morally lost, but physically. If someone today measures military strength against the standards of the Iraq war under Article 5, I feel compelled to express my sympathy.

Another important issue is morality – a concept few wish to mention today. The global order should have been grounded in universal human morality. But where is it? Human life must be the highest value. In the absence of effective political and legal regulation, moral principles should guide states. But even morality has been eroded – systematically dismantled by those who reject the existing order.

New information technologies have reshaped society, transforming communication. Traditional media has given way to social platforms. Filters that once slowed the spread of misinformation are gone. A madman can now become an “expert” overnight, influencing millions – and, by extension, national policy.

While one part of humanity indulged in comfort and debated fairness and inclusion, the other sharpened its blades and raised killers. Even the very institution once responsible for global morality could not bring itself to name the aggressor. For some, morality is murder. For others, it is just business.

So, let us ask the main question: what role do the existing alliances—once the cornerstone of the world order – now serve?

It is not easy, and not pleasant, to evaluate those who have helped us. But if we are to move forward, I must be honest and state my personal view.

I hope that NATO will pass this stress test, which was inevitable. I truly hope the challenge remains moral rather than material. But that is only my hope.

NATO is gripped by fear—fear of expanding to include countries like Ukraine, Moldova, or Georgia. This fear stems from Russia’s assertion that such countries belong to it. But then, what is NATO for if it fears having enemies? Can it still serve as a guarantor of security?

Fear of escalation, “red lines,” and other limits raises questions – even among some NATO members – about whether Article 5 would be honored. That is a deeply troubling signal.

I have often said that the nature of modern war has changed—and continues to change. I am not referring only to drones. Do not deceive yourselves into thinking you only need to reform your defense industries or rearm. You need a new national policy—akin to that seen during the harnessing of nuclear energy or the space race.

This is about science, production, military doctrine, and policy. New tactics, organization, training, and budgetary planning are required. And this transformation demands not only resources, but time. If NATO decided this evening to abandon tanks and focus on technology, it would take five years to reach the level Ukraine achieved in 2024. And by then, technology – and our adversaries – will have moved on.

The nature of modern warfare has outpaced NATO’s capabilities. Its current potential could be exhausted rapidly. A future multi-regional conflict would drain its resources even faster.

These are just a few examples of how to assess alliances realistically. I doubt that our adversaries are unaware of these weaknesses.

So, what should be done?

It starts with leadership—leaders courageous enough to face the truth and guide us into the future. Today’s politicians search for victories in the past: the Soviet Union, pre-1997 NATO borders, “Great America,” Greater Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, Imperial China.

But the world has changed. Technological progress makes returning to the past impossible. That is why we still have the chance to secure the future for our children.

Global problems demand global solutions. We must construct an alternative to the emerging world order of dictatorships.

The West cannot allow Ukraine to lose. Ukraine is the barrier to that authoritarian future.

The next step must be to build a new European security architecture. Given the direction of American policy, the transatlantic security contract appears to be ending.

Europe needs Ukraine as a shield. We have the largest army on the continent – an army that knows how to resist Russia and conduct high-tech warfare.

Ukraine needs Europe for investment and political and moral support.

Europe must consolidate. Today’s difficulties present an opportunity to forge a new alliance – first in security, then economically. Ukraine must be part of it. Without Ukraine, it cannot succeed.

New alliances and coalitions lie ahead. Rapid technological progress offers security – only to those who can form agile coalitions. Technological competition no longer depends solely on GDP. Intelligence tools, advanced weaponry, electronic warfare, and situational awareness are now within reach for almost any state.

At the same time, the war in Ukraine and global military developments show that no country—not even the United States – can dominate all aspects of modern defense technology. The US is falling behind in 5G, hypersonic weapons, electronic warfare, semiconductors, directed energy, and quantum technologies.

Therefore, joint development and sharing of advanced technologies, enhanced manufacturing, and resource consolidation will be vital for any state seeking security through technological superiority. Control over critical resources and technologies will be a matter of survival.

Finally: for such alliances, education and science are the best investments. Innovation will be the decisive competitive edge of the future.