X-Captive Nations Bloc Needed Now More than Ever
One
of the recurring themes of this blog has been the establishment of a comprehensive
bloc of former captive nations of Russian subjugation. Today’s events near
Ukraine and elsewhere demonstrate that such a regional alliance is needed more
than ever.
Since
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and occupation Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk, the former captive nations
have understood that their collective and individual destinies are also threatened.
Moscow has never denied that its mission is to restore the so-called “glory of the Russian empire” and has
warned the international community not to interfere with its plans.
In
numerous news media Ukraine, the Baltic States, Poland and others admitted that
they feel vulnerable to an attack by Russia in the wake of its relentless, shameless
war against Ukraine.
The
free world, led by the United States, has warned Moscow against escalating its
seven-year war versus Ukraine and provided Kyiv with military and humanitarian
aid and funding to endure and hopefully prevail over Russia. Moscow has been
undaunted in pursuing the restoration of its empire.
With
Russian tanks and troops mobilizing on the southeastern border of Ukraine, officials
of the three Baltic States this week in Kyiv unabashedly cast their support for
Ukraine and warned Moscow against crossing the border. This sends a palpable
signal to Moscow and Washington that must be transformed into action. Russia
must be expelled from Ukraine; no compromise; no frozen front lines. All of
Ukraine must be returned to Kyiv’s authority. If the free world collectively doesn’t
stand up and actively defend Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity,
the former captive nations will protect themselves.
Speaking
on behalf of his Latvian and Estonian counterparts, Minister of Foreign Affairs
of the Republic of Lithuania Gabrielius
Landsbergis, declared that Ukraine will never be alone against the
background of Russia’s belligerence.
“The
main message of the Baltic states is that Ukraine will never be alone, and this
should be clearly understood,” the Lithuanian foreign minister said. He emphasized
the consequences for Russia if it crosses the “red lines.”
“We
want to send a clear message to Russia that it must de-escalate the situation,
cease its actions and return to the only path that we see as effective – the
political path, negotiations in the Minsk format and the Normandy format.
Because after crossing the ‘red lines,’ political paths will be less realistic,
and I completely agree with those who say that the consequences cannot be
avoided,” he said.
“The mission of the joint visit is to express strong support to
Ukraine and reconfirm support for its territorial integrity and sovereignty,” Estonian
Ministry spokeswoman Aari Lemmik
told Reuters.
Landsbergis
separately expressed support for Ukraine’s reforms and Euro-Atlantic course.
“We
support the reforms. We support Ukraine's rapprochement with the European Union
and NATO. We stand with you. We
stand in solidarity with you and are ready to provide everything you need in
the future and move you forward in your aspirations,” he said.
Last
month, President of Lithuania Gitanas
Nausėda delivered a speech to Ukrainian lawmakers and the nation, which I wrote
would be remembered by generations to come for its inspirational bi-national
call to arms that also paid homage to the nations’ glorious past and succinctly
pointed to a mutually beneficial future. Noting the commonality of Ukrainians
and Lithuanians, Nausėda said: “And we, Lithuanians, were at your side every
time the Ukrainian nation would rise to defend its dignity. For centuries, we
had been next to each other and even built a common state. We traded, made
cultural exchanges, fought back against a common enemy” – an obvious reference
to Russia.
The
expansion of the Russian empire throughout its former enslaved lands would
certainly give rise to a new east-west division and an iron curtain, as Anaïs
Marin, UN special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus, said at
the Urgent Debate on the situation of human rights in Belarus Human Rights
Council 45th session. She urged the global community to help the small country
before an iron curtain again descends on Eastern Europe. “Excellencies, Let’s
not allow another iron curtain to descend on the European continent,” Marin
pleaded.
Such
a former captive nation’s alliance must be multifunctional to benefit all segments
of their peoples, however, inasmuch as Russia is waging war in the region – and
threatening other areas as well – the bloc should first endeavor to build a
solid military group along the lines of the “Hetman Konstantyn Ostrohskiy” Lithuanian-Polish-Ukrainian Brigade
(LITPOLUKR). According to military
media and the brigade’s website, this unit represents a new era of multilateral
security cooperation in Europe. Lithuanian, Polish, and Ukrainian efforts to
bolster European stability in the wake of Russia’s destabilizing invasion of Ukraine
led to the creation of the unit in 2015. The brigade’s website notes that each participating
country contributes an infantry battalion, staff for the headquarters in
Lublin, and specialized smaller units, to create a brigade between 3.5-4,000 soldiers,
which perhaps might not be enough to serve a practical mission.
The
brigade’s main task is to serve as a peacekeeping force to be deployed with the
unanimous consent of all participating states. However, the brigade is also
intended to bolster regional military cooperation.
The
work of this joint military unit should reinforce in the minds of global
leaders the comprehensive concept of what was a captive nation in Russia’s
dungeon and what is a former captive nation, now independent state, ready to
defend itself and assume its rightful place among the countries of the world.
It is important for military leaders to know that they have a trusted, well
trained and battle-hardened ally in this brigade as free world seeks to stem
Russia’s aggression. They should also take note that if for any reason the free
world fails to support the x-captive nations, they will then do so on their
own.
Former
Lithuanian Minister of Foreign Affairs
Linas Antanas Linkevičius, an outspoken critic of Russian imperialism, observed
“It’s not just that we hear about threats but we testify them because they are
real, they are not a big secret. Let’s remember the case of annexing the
territory of Georgia, and recently they did so with the Crimea. We are asking
ourselves how we can really resist it.
“If
you are asking whether or not Russia is threatening our region, this is a
different case. Lithuania is a member of NATO and the European Union, so there
is no direct threat. However, there are insecurities in the region, and
militaristic arguments are used in political debates. This is worrying and we
have to understand it as a challenge and react.”
Linkevičius
has pointed out that Russia’s threat, or hybrid war as he and others call it,
is not only felt in his country but also everywhere around the world.
“It
is not only present in the Eastern parts of Europe but also in the West.
Inevitable are strategies used in war such as apply energy as a weapon,
strategic communication, propaganda, cyberattacks. I think we should really
take care of the threats and know how to resist them through best practices. We
need to work closely so we cannot underestimate this threat,” he said.
Estonian
Minister of Defense Juri Luik had said NATO is an answer. “Russia has become a threat
again, and the need for NATO is stronger than ever. This is the framework
holding the European defense together – an agreement between states that allows
us to continue pursuing our strategic goal despite the internal political
flutters,” Luik said.
Short
of the free world’s tangible involvement in safeguarding the independence of
the former captive nations, NATO’s visible muscle and the West’s tepid attitude,
the former enslaved peoples’ only salvation, as I am proposing again, is for
them to form a regional mini-NATO, an updated Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations (ABN), that would noticeably promote
and safeguard collective security against Russia.
Moscow
today is the world’s main exporter of various threats and instability. The
Kremlin has extended Russia’s destructive influence because its leadership’s
aggressive actions have not faced a formidable deterrent, as Linkevičius and
others have suggested. The free world should learn from its post-World War Two mistake
of rejecting warnings about Russian belligerence. Now is the time to build effective
deterrents.
Ukraine
and the region can’t wait any longer for decisive and principled international
action under free world leadership to bring an end to Russia’s destructive
ambitions.
The
former captive nations must now seize the initiative and form a dynamic
regional bloc.