Sunday, October 18, 2026

Russians Inflict Widespread Civilian Casualties and Energy Grid Destruction 

Major developments across Ukraine and along the front line today, October 18, feature significant strategic moves, continued Russian air strikes on Ukrainian cities, and long-range response operations. Reports also highlight widespread civilian casualties, regional damage, and systemic energy grid destruction resulting from sustained Russian missile and drone attacks.

Nationwide Daily Toll: Over the past 24 hours, regional military administrations across Ukraine confirmed at least 10 civilians killed and 73 injured in coordinated air strikes.

Western Oblasts Targeted: Long-range Russian attack drones struck western regions including Volyn, Rivne, and Ternopil. In Volyn Oblast (Manevychi), drone strikes caused a massive fire at an industrial complex.

Central & Eastern Regions; Dnipro / Dnipropetrovsk Oblast: Repeated morning strikes hit critical civil infrastructure.

Chernihiv Oblast: Strike drones hit residential yards and private housing, causing civilian injuries.

Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv & Odesa Oblasts: Sustained shelling and glide-bomb attacks continued to strike apartment buildings and suburban residential areas.

Cumulative Impact: UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission (HRMMU) data indicates over 17,000 civilians killed and nearly 54,000 injured since the start of the full-scale invasion, with late 2026 showing a sharp 50%+ escalation in monthly civilian casualties.

More than 15 Generating Facilities Struck: Recent salvos targeted power generation plants and high-voltage transmission substations nationwide.

Regional Blackouts: Emergency crews are conducting round-the-clock repairs to restore power grid disruptions in Lviv, Odesa, and central regions following direct hits to energy distribution networks.

Heating & Winter Vulnerability: Municipal authorities across several major urban hubs—including Kyiv and Kharkiv—are accelerating emergency measures to secure heating and water systems ahead of winter as transformer capacity remains severely depleted.

Education & Healthcare: Over 4,200 educational institutions (schools, kindergartens, universities) and hundreds of healthcare facilities across Ukraine have been damaged or destroyed.

Housing & Displacement: Millions of residential units remain damaged or unlivable, leaving approximately 3.7 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) within Ukraine alongside nearly 6 million refugees abroad.

Tensions Over Strategic Systems: Kyiv continues discussions with international partners regarding operational status and bandwidth restrictions on front-line communication systems (including Starshield networks).

Capitol Hill Pushback against Trump’s anti-Ukraine Policies: ‘Looks Like They Were Written in Russian’

While criticism of President Donald Trump’s slam dunk support for Russian fuhrer Vladimir Putin has infuriated Ukrainians American voters and launched many lawmakers into tirades against the President’s blind advocacy on behalf of the Kremlin, the condemnation on Capital Hill isn’t universal.

Half of the political divide in Congress, the Republican side, doesn’t know if it should stand up and be counted on Ukraine’s side, as it traditionally has been, or should it fall in line behind the GOP President.

No, anger or criticism against President Trump’s Ukraine policies is not equally divided between Democrats and Republicans.

The dynamics differ significantly between the two parties:

For Democrats, opposition is near-universal and foundational. Virtually the entire Democratic caucus in both the House and Senate opposes Trump’s approach. They view his policies—such as pressuring Ukraine toward territorial concessions, seeking energy deals with Moscow, and waiving sanctions—as a betrayal of a democratic ally, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his morally justified position, and a capitulation to Russian fuhrer and UN designated criminal Vladimir Putin.

For Republicans, the party is visibly fractured and divided. While a strong populist/isolationist wing enthusiastically supports Trump’s “America First” posture and desire to scale down involvement, a substantial and vocal bloc of traditional, hawkish Republicans (such as Sens. Roger Wicker, Thom Tillis, Susan Collins, and Lisa Murkowski) strongly disagree with these specific policies. These GOP hawks join Democrats to push back against sanctions waivers and forced territorial compromises because they view them as weak on Russia.

Therefore, while Democrats are uniformly critical, Republican criticism comes from a distinct faction breaking ranks with the party's center of gravity, rather than a 50/50 split of the whole party.

It is a striking illustration of how much the center of gravity within the Republican Party has shifted over the last several years.

Historically, the GOP was defined by a strong, traditional "Reaganite" foreign policy—one rooted in staunch opposition to Moscow, deep skepticism of Russian leadership, and a commitment to defending democratic allies abroad. They proudly quote their standard bearer President Ronald Reagan, who dramatically declared in 1983: “Ukraine, you are not alone. Your struggle is our struggle, your dream is our dream, and someday, you, too will be free.”

For many observers, that legacy suggested that a critical mass of Republican lawmakers would stand firm in defense of the former captive nations against any policy perceived as capitulating to the Kremlin.

Instead, several structural and political realities have kept most Republicans from mounting a wider, cohesive rebellion:

The Power of the “America First” Base: Donald Trump holds immense sway over the Republican primary electorate. For many lawmakers, breaking too sharply with his foreign policy positions risks drawing a primary challenger or losing the backing of grassroots conservative voters who have grown deeply skeptical of foreign entanglements and open-ended aid.

The "Vocal Minority" Trap: While there are respected GOP hawks (such as Senators Roger Wicker, Thom Tillis, and Susan Collins) who routinely push back—and occasionally join Democrats to pass targeted measures—they often find themselves swimming against the current of a party heavily influenced by populist, isolationist, or fatigue-driven factions.

Balancing Act: Many traditional Republicans try to walk a careful tightrope. They will publicly fact-check harsh rhetoric against Kyiv or object to specific concessions, yet they hesitate to launch a full-scale, institutional confrontation with the leader of their own party over foreign policy.

This highlights why the few Republicans who do speak out stand out so sharply: they are preserving an older tradition of the party that has largely been sidelined in the current political landscape.

The righteous pro-Ukraine Democrats and the sprinkling of Republicans may be able to hold the fort and return moral fortitude to the halls of Congress.

A sampling of comments by the pro-Ukraine lawmakers:

Recent criticisms from both sides of the aisle in the US Senate and House of Representatives regarding President Trump’s Ukraine policies center on two main developments: proposed territorial concessions in peace negotiations and recent sanctions waivers or energy agreements with Russia.

1. Criticisms of Proposed Peace Plan and Territorial Concessions

Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS): "This so-called 'peace plan' has real problems, and I am highly skeptical it will achieve peace... Rewarding Russian butchery would be disastrous to America's interests."

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC): "Putin is a murderer, a rapist and an assassin. We should not do anything that makes him feel like he has a win here."

Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD): Expressed deep skepticism about peace proposals requiring major concessions, stating at the Halifax Security Forum that the initial drafted terms "looked more like it was written in Russian to begin with."

Sen. Angus King (I-ME): "You think Xi Jinping is paying attention to this? You think Kim Jong Un is paying attention? I mean, this is one of the most serious geopolitical mistakes in my lifetime."

Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE): Strongly criticized terms that pressure Kyiv, warning that forcing land cessions effectively amounts to a "surrender to Russia" and emboldens authoritarian aggressors globally.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH): "That's a Putin plan. That was very clearly written by Putin and Russia for what they want to see... It's a travesty on the American people as well as the Ukrainian people."

2. Criticisms of Energy Deals and Sanctions Waivers

Bipartisan Senate Foreign Relations Group (Led by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen & Bipartisan Colleagues): In a joint statement calling on the administration to rescind Russian diesel licensing agreements and execute sanctions: "The United States should not provide Putin with a financial lifeline while Russia continues to kill Ukrainian civilians."

Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) – Ranking Member, House Foreign Affairs Committee: Following sanctions waivers granted to Russian energy interests: "I warned on the floor that this... would give Ukraine false hope that the administration would finally get tough on Russia... What he lacks is the will."

3. Key Themes of Congressional Pushback

Territorial Integrity: Pressuring Kyiv to cede occupied land sets a dangerous global precedent for territorial conquest.

Sanctions and Leverage: Waiving energy sanctions undermines Western economic leverage just as Ukraine faces ongoing strikes.

Deterrence: Softening policy on Moscow signals weakness to adversary nations like China and North Korea.

Despite President Trump’s narcissistic belief that only his position will prevail, actually, the ballot box will decide which way the balance will tilt. Ukrainian American voters, like the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, and kindred spirits across the country are endeavoring to keep both Houses of Congress and the United States  on the right side of history defending Ukraine and the other former captive nations against ongoing Russian threats and aggression.

Saturday, October 17, 2026

Trump Waives Sanctions and Shocks World; Killings in Ukraine Continue 

Much to the shock, chagrin and anger of Ukrainians and its allies, President Donald Trump has sided with Russia and signed an executive order waiving key US sanction packages targeting Russia’s energy and defense sectors—specifically blocking elements of the Lindsey Graham Act, which targeted Russian energy revenues, Russian banks, and the "shadow fleet" of oil tankers. 

The Diesel Deal: The waiver was linked to a broader transaction under which Russia would supply diesel in exchange for US sanctions relief. 

“Financial Rewards" for Putin: President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated that blocking these measures amounts to an "American sanctions blackout" and acts as "financial rewards for Putin." He argued that easing pressure right as Russia ramps up seasonal winter strikes on Ukraine's power grid—attempting to cause a blackout ahead of winter—does not stop the war, but rather "gives Putin every reason to prolong it endlessly." 

Fears of Further Relief: Zelenskyy expressed concern on social media that this diesel deal and waiver were "not the end of it," warning that continued rollbacks of sanctions would only fuel Kremlin confidence. 

Tribute to Lindsey Graham: Zelenskyy invoked the memory of the late Senator Lindsey Graham (the primary sponsor of the sanctions bill), noting that Graham worked tirelessly to push maximum assistance and pressure against the aggressor, and that dismantling his namesake act undermines that legacy. 

At the EU summit, European Council President António Costa and other leaders reaffirmed that "now is not the time to relieve Russia's sanctions" and pledged continued support. 

Bipartisan Backlash in Washington: The move has drawn strong criticism from US lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, with Republican Sen. John Cornyn stating "Lindsey would be appalled," and Democrats urging action in Congress to reverse the waiver.

As for the frontline operations and tactical developments in the war, the Pokrovsk Sector witnessed heavy assaults: The Ukrainian 155th Separate Mechanized Brigade reported repelling the largest Russian motorcycle-mounted mechanized assault of 2026 in the Pokrovsk sector. Russian forces attempted to utilize fog and poor visibility to advance, but Ukrainian units coordinated artillery and drone strikes to halt the attack.

Ukraine's General Staff confirmed targeted long-range strikes against Russian drone manufacturing facilities (including the "Roboavia" facility) and critical logistics hubs behind enemy lines. 

The General Staff formally rejected claims by Russian commanders regarding alleged deep advances toward Kramatorsk and the capture of Dobropillia, emphasizing that positions along those axes remain held. 

Sanctions & Political Pressure: President Zelenskyy addressed media inquiries regarding shifting diplomatic dynamics in Washington, expressing concern over potential further easing of sanctions against Russia following recent preliminary agreements.

Ukrainian officials highlighted technical restrictions currently impacting Starlink satellite terminals during high-speed operational maneuvers, which has presented challenges for interceptor drone connectivity.  Targeting of Urban Centers: Shelling and drone strikes were reported across eastern and southern regional hubs, including Zaporizhzhia.

Weather & Regional Conditions: Severe, dense autumn fog swept across central regions—including Kyiv, Vinnytsia, Cherkasy, and Kirovohrad oblasts—slowing movement and creating challenging operating conditions along transportation corridors.

Reported Casualties & Fatalities were also reported. Kherson Region: Russian forces dropped guided aerial bombs (GABs) and launched heavy shelling against residential areas in Kherson. Regional authorities and prosecutors confirmed at least 1 civilian killed and 40 others injured (including three children).  

Overnight Energy Wave Strikes: During the massive overnight barrage of over 320 drones and missiles directed at energy facilities across 22 locations, local emergency services reported civilian casualties across multiple oblasts, including fatalities in central and southern regions.  

Ukrainian military also discovered the execution of Ukrainian POWs in the Zaporizhzhia Sector: Ukrainian military authorities learned that Russian forces (identified as belonging to the 38th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade) executed Ukrainian prisoners of war.

According to officials, this is a new incident.  Operational Group "South" released details of the execution, which occurred recently along the Huliaipole sector in Zaporizhzhia Oblast.

Evidence & Radio Intercepts: Ukrainian forces captured the crime on drone footage hovering above the scene and intercepted internal Russian radio comms. 

The audio recordings revealed explicit commands from Russian commanders instructing troops on the ground to "finish off that one—the '300'" (referring to a wounded soldier) and "liquidate him immediately.”

Perpetrators Identified: Ukrainian military officials named personnel from Russia’s 38th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade as those involved, alleging that these execution orders stem directly from brigade commander Colonel Valery Kazak.  

The footage, radio logs, and preliminary findings have been formally transferred to the Zaporizhzhia Oblast Prosecutor's Office to open a war crimes investigation.

The Russian war against Ukraine, the killings and destruction will continue as long as Donald Trump sides with Russia and Putin. Russian aggression must be terminated, Russia must be subdued and expelled from Ukraine for the good of the world.

Friday, October 16, 2026

While Trump Insults Zelenskyy and Urges Ukraine’s Surrender, Russia Gets Off Scott Free and Continues Killing Unarmed Ukrainians 

Russian forces launched systematic, repeated waves of drone and missile strikes on Friday, October 16, targeting critical civilian and energy infrastructure across Ukraine.  

Human Toll & Casualties

The UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine highlighted that October has proven to be one of the deadliest periods for civilians in years, following record casualty levels verified through September.

Local emergency services reported: 

Fatalities & Injuries: At least 8 to 11 civilian fatalities and over 60 injuries recorded nationwide from direct strikes and falling debris across multiple regions.

Frontline & Regional Strikes: Dnipropetrovsk region sustained heavy artillery and drone strikes, with casualties reported in Pavlohrad, Kamianske, and Kryvyi Rih. Strikes in eastern and central Ukraine added to the casualty toll as rescue operations concluded.

Infrastructure & Grid Damage

Mass strike barrages targeted critical energy infrastructure across multiple regions. Over 1 million people temporarily lost electrical power across western regions (including Rivne and surrounding districts). Energy restoration crews managed to bring power back online for large portions of the affected areas later in the day. 

Ukraine's Ministry of Energy reported targeted attacks on energy facilities in Kyiv, the Kyiv region, and five additional regions including Kharkiv, Rivne, Volyn, and Odesa.

Power Disruptions: The strikes triggered emergency power cutoffs and grid stabilization outages. Energy crews worked throughout the day to restore power supply to over 1 million affected consumers as repair operations continued wherever safe. 

Civilian & Commercial Facilities: Drones and missile strikes damaged commercial sites, warehouses, transportation hubs, and residential buildings in Rivne and Kropyvnytskyi.

Sadly, Trump is pursuing an immoral, unethical policy against Ukraine. The phrases that he is  anti-Ukraine and a Putin lackey are rightfully surfacing across the internet.

Civilian Casualties in Ukraine at Hands of Russia Continue to Rise Alarmingly Across Country 

The intensification of attacks by Russia across Ukraine in September continued a pattern of rising civilian casualties in 2026 far exceeding levels verified in previous years, with devastating consequences for civilians, the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) said when releasing its monthly update on civilian harm in Ukraine today. Repeated attacks on energy infrastructure threaten to deepen that suffering.
HRMMU verified that at least 328 civilians were killed and 2,105 injured in September, which makes the total number of killed and injured 85 percent higher than in September 2025 (249 killed and 1,068 injured). Civilians were killed and injured across 22 regions of Ukraine and the city of Kyiv, with particularly high casualties in Kyiv city, Kherson, Kharkiv, Sumy and Zaporizhzhia. In Kyiv alone civilian casualties were recorded on 22 of 30 days, more frequently than in any previous month since the start of the full-scale invasion.

However, when evaluating the overall human cost of the conflict, looking at the contrast between Ukrainians and Russians helps frame the scale of the devastation.

On one side, you have systematic, nationwide aerial campaigns targeting population centers and energy infrastructure across dozens of Ukrainian regions—resulting in numbers like those 2,433 casualties in September alone. On the other side, even accounting for cross-border strikes in Russian border oblasts, the footprint of harm is vastly different in scale, frequency, and intent.

It lays bare the stark asymmetry of what is happening on the ground.

The trend of high civilian casualties continued into October, HRMMU said. For example, during the night of 6-7 October, Russian armed forces launched a cruise missile and drone attack across several regions of Ukraine, including Chernihiv region, where 22 civilians were killed and 45 injured in Pryluky. HRMMU documented other attacks with high numbers of killed civilians including in Kramatorsk on 8 October, in Zaporizhzhia on 10 October, and in Lutsk on 14 October.   

“The first two weeks of October were among the deadliest periods for civilians in years,” said Danielle Bell, head of HRMMU. “In a matter of days, attacks by the Russian armed forces caused mass-casualty incidents in Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, Kramatorsk and Kyiv.”

The verified numbers for September include 18 civilians killed and 44 injured in territory of Ukraine occupied by the Russian Federation. The actual number is likely significantly higher as lack of access and independent sources of information has made it difficult to verify many of the incidents. 

The high number of civilian casualties in September and October came as Russian armed forces resumed systematic attacks on energy infrastructure across Ukraine. On 30 August, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation announced that it had begun preparations to launch “massive strikes against Ukrainian energy facilities.” On 30 September, an attack damaged electricity generation, distribution and transmission facilities in three regions and Kyiv city, causing emergency power outages. 

Attacks on electricity and heating infrastructure in Ukraine continued into October. In a recent attack, Russian armed forces on 13-14 October struck multiple energy facilities across Ukraine, including the three main power stations in Kyiv. The attack temporarily left 600,000 people in Kyiv without electricity, according to Ukrainian authorities. 

Ukrainian Armed Forces also targeted electricity and heating infrastructure in territory occupied by Russian. Statistics published by the Unmanned Systems Forces of the Ukrainian armed forces indicated that they had conducted 82 attacks on energy infrastructure in occupied territory and the Russian Federation.

“Systematically attacking electricity and heating infrastructure as winter approaches is bound to inflict significant suffering on the civilian population,” the UN’s Bell warned.  

Thursday, October 15, 2026

And President Trump Still Has the Audacity to Demand that Ukraine Stop Fighting

Every day Russian drones and missiles kill innocent, unarmed Ukrainian men, women and children.

At least 10 people were killed and 66 others injured across Ukraine over the past day, as hundreds of Russian drones struck targets across the full width of the country, regional authorities said on October 15.

Kirovohrad Oblast experienced the most massive attack the oblast has seen since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion overnight, as Russia killed three people and injured six others, said regional governor Andrii Raikovych. The casualties are the result of Russian attacks on Kropyvnytskyi, he added.

Russia struck critical infrastructure, transport enterprises, logistics facilities, and residential buildings with almost 360 drones across 26 locations, Raikovych said.

“It is obvious that Russia deliberately escalated the attacks, having received a relaxation of sanctions and seeing attempts to put pressure on Ukraine. Russia uses every such moment and must be responsible for what it does,” President Volodymyr Zelensky said, referring to the attack.

Ukraine's Air Force said Russia attacked Ukraine overnight from 06:00 p.m. with 580 Shahed-type and other drones, as well as with two Kh-59 guided aircraft missiles. The Air Force said it neutralized 536 of the Russian drones across 31 locations.

Zelensky said that Russia used a total of 850 Shahed-type drones during the day since 09:00 a.m. on Oct. 14.

“There were constant waves, and our sky was not clear of them for a single hour,” he said.

Russian attacks in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, killed three people and injured three more, authorities said. Regional governor Oleksandr Hanzha reported two people died in Novooleksandrivka and two others injured. A third person was injured in a Russian strike on a private house in Pavlohrad, Hanzha added. Zelensky raised the number of people killed in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast to three.

In western Volyn Oblast, wreckage of a Russian drone fell on the city of Lutsk, killing six people and injuring 12 others, regional governor Roman Romaniuk said. A large-scale fire broke out in the 'Eurogroup' warehouse as a result of the Russian attack, killing five people at the scene, and injuring a sixth person so heavily they succumbed in hospital, Romaniuk said.

In Rivne Oblast, a Russian drone crashed into the city during the day on Oct. 14, injuring eight people, including a child born in 2012, according to regional governor Oleksandr Koval. The oblast also experienced several attack waves overnight, but no people were injured, he said.

In Kyiv Oblast, Russian attacks over the past day injured four people across Bucha, Obukhiv, and Fastiv districts, the regional military administration said. In total, Russia struck across 26 locations in the oblast, damaging private houses, infrastructure, warehouses, and cars.

In eastern Donetsk Oblast, three people were killed and eight others injured in Russian attacks over the past day, according to regional governor Vadym Filashkin.

In Kharkiv Oblast, Russian attacks injured nine people, regional governor Oleh Syniehubov said. The explosion of an unknown object in the village of Spodobivka also killed one man and injured a 15-year-old boy, the governor added. Russian attacks damaged private and commercial buildings, as well as parts of the power grid, Syniehubov said.

In southern Kherson Oblast, Russian attacks killed one person and injured five other people over the past day, regional governor Oleksandr Prokudin said. Many settlements in the oblast, including the city of Kherson, were under Russian artillery, drone, and air attacks throughout the day, he added.

In southeastern Zaporizhzhia Oblast, seven people were injured as Russia attacked over the past day, with almost 200 artillery strikes, 734 drones of varying types, and two missiles, according to regional governor Ivan Fedorov .

A Russian attack on Ternopil Oblast injured five people, as a Russian drone struck a manufacturing enterprise in Chortkiv, according to regional governor Taras Pastukh  and Ukraine’s Interior Ministry.

In northeastern Sumy Oblast, Russian attacks did not lead to casualties or injuries but damaged a number of private houses and civil infrastructure, as the air raid alert lasted for more than 18 combined hours, the Sumy military administration said. 

Italy’s Meloni Shows ‘True Grit’ about Ukraine and Russian Aggression

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s address to parliament today before the European Union leaders’ summit offered a masterclass in moral clarity. By plainly declaring the false logic of some that “surrender is not peace; it is conquest,” Meloni directly called out political voices in Europe and Washington who dress up capitulation as “peace proposals.”

“If the aggressor can aim for the opponent’s surrender, why would they need to negotiate? Surrender is not peace; it is conquest. If Ukraine were to stop defending itself tomorrow... we would not have peace,” the Italian leader elaborated.

Meloni’s speech was widely lauded by Ukrainian leadership and diplomats like Sergiy Kyslytsya, first deputy head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, because it clearly articulated the core existential reality: forcing Ukraine into concessions under fire is not a peace plan – it is an invitation for further Russian imperial expansion. Her consistent stance highlights Italy’s role as one of the steady pillars of Euro-Atlantic unity despite domestic political pressure.

Meloni noted that Russian führer Vladimir Putin is actively escalating provocations and hybrid threats across Europe to divert Western focus away from Moscow’s struggles on the battlefield.

“Support for Kyiv is not an alternative to peace; it is what makes peace possible,” she stated.

Invoking the memory of Russian tanks in Prague and Budapest and the shadow of the Berlin Wall, Meloni reminded European lawmakers what happens when Soviet-style imperialism goes unchecked.

She pushed back against historical amnesia, reminding lawmakers of Europe’s past under Moscow’s sphere of influence: “I do not miss the days when Russian tanks were deployed in European countries... We would be discussing the occupation of a European country and the return of Soviet-style imperialism, which Europe experienced for half a century.”

Meloni underscored that Russia’s stalled momentum on the battlefield isn’t accidental – it is the direct result of Ukrainian bravery and Western military aid. That battlefield reality, she argued, is the only leverage capable of forcing Moscow to negotiate in good faith.

Her sharp critique extended beyond Europe, openly questioning recent Washington moves—such as agreements touching Russian energy products—as risky maneuvers that risk legitimizing Moscow and funding its war machine while civilian centers remain under fire.

It’s no surprise diplomats like Sergiy Kyslytsya lauded her speech. At a moment when “Ukraine fatigue” and backdoor dealmaking threaten unity, Meloni provided the exact framework the West needs: peace built on strength, not victim-blaming.

Meloni’s speech is a lesson for President Donald Trump.