Ukraine Seeks Justice for Russian War Crimes & Crimes against Humanity
Citing an International
Criminal Court report that confirms the existence of sufficient evidence
that Russia has committed war crimes and crimes against humanity in its nearly
eight-year war in Ukraine, Kyiv is pressing for a full investigation into Moscow’s
violations of international law.
“The
Prosecutor’s report clearly states that there are sufficient grounds to believe
that the crimes committed in both Crimea and Donbas fall within the Court’s
jurisdiction. These are war crimes and crimes against humanity. Among them is a
significant number of crimes against civilians.” Yuriy Vitrenko of the Permanent Mission of Ukraine said this week
in the United Nations.
In 2014,
Russia seized and illegally occupied the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea and two
eastern oblasts of Luhansk and Donetsk, ultimately renaming the latter two as
the Luhansk and Donetsk Peoples Republics. Human rights violations have been
committed by Russia and its foreign mercenaries in all three regions and have
been condemned by the United Nations and other international organizations. In
Crimea, Russia has forbidden Crimean Tatars from fostering their ancestral
culture and religion and have suffered death and arrests for violating Moscow’s
draconian laws. More than 14,000 people have been killed during the war that
has resulted in more than 1 million refugees.
For
example, in February to July of this year, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights found: “The number
of ceasefire violations in the conflict zone considerably increased compared
with the preceding six months, resulting in increased civilian casualties and
damage to civilian objects. OHCHR documented 62 civilian casualties occurring
in the reporting period, a total of 15 people killed (11 men, three boys and
one girl), and 47 injured (30 men, 13 women, three boys and one girl),
representing a 51 percent increase compared with the preceding six months.
Thirteen civilian casualties resulted from active hostilities, two while 47
resulted from mine-related incidents3 and handling of explosive remnants of
war. In addition, one man was also killed in a security incident and one woman
was beaten by a soldier. Residents in the conflict zone complained about
psychological distress due to the resumption of hostilities after a prolonged
period of relative silence. The availability of weapons also resulted in grave
incidents of domestic violence affecting women and children.
Vitrenko
said in his address that Ukraine has met the criteria to have such an
investigation opened and is “seeking judicial authorization to open such an
investigation.”
Vitrenko
pointed out that the declarations regarding these crimes have been made for an
indefinite duration and “the ICC will be able to exercise its jurisdiction over
such crimes regardless of the nationality of persons who have committed them,
even if they were citizens of the third states.”
According
to Vitrenko, “Ukrainian law enforcement agencies in cooperation with civil
society organizations and human rights defenders continued to document and
provide the Court with additional information, facts and evidences related both
to the nature of existing armed conflict in Ukraine as international armed conflict
caused by a foreign armed aggression as well as to numerous war crimes committed
by the aggressor-state armed forces, its occupation authorities, its personnel
and proxies in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine.”
He
concluded, “The demand of the people of Ukraine for justice, prosecution and
holding to account all perpetrators of grave crimes committed in Ukraine
remains unwavering, just as Ukraine’s government support of the work of the
ICC.”