Let Ukraine finally Join NATO
In 1949 the North Atlantic Treaty Organization was founded
in Washington, DC, in order to secure peace in post-war Europe, to promote
cooperation among its victorious members and to guard their freedom. Today,
NATO is a security alliance consisting of 31 countries from North
America and Europe. It is designed to protect European allies against missile
threats from outside the Euro-Atlantic area.
For decades, NATO served as an effective bulwark against soviet
russia expansion. That russia has emerged as an aggressor state, leading to a
destabilization of the European continent, is proof of NATO’s continued
importance for both the United States and Europe as a safeguard against
continued russian expansionism. In addition to the full-blown military invasion
of Ukraine, the repeated serious russian provocations directed against
neighboring NATO and non-NATO nations in the region and beyond endanger not
only the sovereignty and territorial integrity of European allies, but the
future viability of all trans-Atlantic security structures. It also disbalances
the post-World War II geopolitical structure.
While russia was not openly labeled as the country that
violates regional and global peace and threatens the members’ freedom, for all
intents and purposes for the past seven decades and more it actually has
endangered peace, security, cooperation and development throughout the region
and planet.
Initially, “old” Europe and the United States and Canada became
members of NATO. Then after the fall of the iron curtain, the dividing line between
the righteous and dishonorable countries, the former captive nations, “new”
Europe, were invited to join NATO.
Thus the stage was set for a geopolitical conundrum for the
leadership of the free world.
Ukraine, since declaring independence in 1991, has been an
on again, off again candidate for membership. A host of definitions and encouraging
labels were devised for the process of allowing Ukraine to accede to NATO while not
upsetting russia. None of them made sense considering the fact that Ukraine’s
neighbors to the west were accepted as NATO members and they have been Ukraine’s
staunchest supporters since their accession.
Now that russia is fulfilling its age-old mission to invade
and subjugate Ukraine and imprison or annihilate the Ukrainian nation, the
issue of Ukraine’s accession to NATO is once again top of mind. The russian war
is killing Ukrainian men, women and children, destroying the infrastructure and
ruining the environment.
The NATO members will gather in Vilnius, Lithuania, for a
two-day meeting beginning tomorrow and Ukraine will be the key point on the
Agenda. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine, after threatening not to
attend if the discussion will not be meaningful, will actually be present
perhaps signaling that it won’t be a waste of time.
Undeniably, Ukraine is the most popular country on earth today.
It has become the repository of the world’s latest armaments to defeat russia. And
putin made it so by shedding blood across the Ukrainian landscape; by missiles strike
against residential homes and pizzerias; by blowing up a dam and flooding
arable land.
The loudest supporters of Ukraine’s accession to NATO are
the former captive nations of russian subjugation. They know the pain of the
kremlin’s captivity and they know that if Ukraine falls, they will soon fall
afterward. And then “old” Europe.
Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, considered by her
contemporaries the Margaret Thatcher of her day, on July 4 said that NATO
membership “is the only security guarantee” for Ukraine and said it is
important that NATO member countries agree during their summit in Vilnius on “practical
steps” on how Ukraine gets into the alliance.
It is important that during the summit members “go beyond
the Bucharest wording,” Kallas said, referring to the 2008 summit declaration
that offered Ukraine an opportunity to join the alliance without a concrete
timetable.
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said the alliance will support Ukraine
for as long as necessary. “We are sending a message to putin that he will not
win the war,” he clarified.
“I think all the allies realize that Ukraine is in the
middle of a war, and this is not a good time to invite it to join. But all
allies understand that the door remains open, and we have demonstrated that
with Finland and Sweden. All the allies realize that Ukraine will become a
member, and it is up to the allies to decide when Ukraine is invited to join
NATO. But most importantly, the allies understand that the most important thing
now is to support Ukraine. If we don’t do that, Ukraine will no longer exist as
an independent country. And if it doesn’t exist as an independent country, the
question of its membership becomes meaningless,” Stoltenberg.
And so on and so forth. The Lithuanians and Poles support
Ukraine’s accession to NATO.
Polish President Andrzej Duda has called on NATO member
states to give Kyiv a clear roadmap to joining the defense alliance. “Ukraine
is waiting for an unambiguous signal regarding a clear prospect of membership
in NATO,” Duda said.
The American Jewish Committee (AJC) is also urging NATO to
give Ukraine a “clear path” to becoming a member of the alliance to deter
further aggression by Russia and other “bad actors” who seek to destabilize
Europe. In a letter prior to the NATO summit AJC CEO Ted Deutch and AJC
President Michael Tichnor described Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as posing a
threat to democracy and the international order.
“Welcoming Ukraine into NATO would send a strong signal also
to other bad actors, ranging from Pyongyang to Tehran,” the letter states. “If
Western nations demonstrate unity and resolve by accepting Ukraine, it would
help deter these actors as well and convey a clear message that any aggression
or destabilizing behavior will be met with a strong response.”
“While critics argue that Ukraine’s NATO membership could
further escalate tensions with Russia, potentially leading to more conflict,
history has shown that the lack of strong action in the face of aggression only
emboldens aggressors,” they wrote, “By embracing Ukraine and reinforcing its
security, NATO can help deter further Russian aggression and provide a stable
framework for dialogue and de-escalation.”
But, apparently, russia’s war against Ukraine, russian boots
on Ukrainian land and Article 5 are scaring the allies, the staunch supporters
of Ukraine from ushering Ukraine into their midst and an equal among equal
partner.
“Of course, we understand it cannot happen when the war is
going on. But we have to have a clear pathway [for] how Ukraine gets there,” Estonia’s
Kallas opined.
Enough with the caution. Russia is incapable of fighting Ukraine’s
accession to NATO.
NATO membership for Ukraine would send a powerful political
message to the world, to russia, about the free world’s support for Ukraine and
belief in its integrity and future, far beyond the ever important HIMARs, tanks
and cluster bombs. It would tell the world that now Ukraine is a worthy
candidate for members in NATO and it deserves to be a member. But more so NATO
deserves such a shining new member as Ukraine, the only country on earth that
in seven decades as accrued the military prowess to fight and hold at bay the former
second biggest army in the world. And if those reasons aren’t enough, 89% of
Ukrainians support their country’s membership in NATO.
So, temporarily suspend Article 5, agree that the free world
won’t send its boys to fight and die in Ukraine, Ukrainians are doing that
already for the benefit of their country and the free world. But give Ukraine
full membership. Tell all regions of the world that Ukraine is worthy of
membership that will preserve the 32-year-old independent, sovereign and
democratic country. Show impotent, decrepit russia that it can’t dictate who can
become a NATO member and who can’t.
This is the only righteous course of action for the free
world, NATO, the x-captive nations, and Ukraine.
No comments:
Post a Comment