Friday, June 2, 2023

Better Late than Never or We Told You So

It’s been an axiom of The Torn Curtain 1991 that russia would never accept Ukraine’s independence proclamation of 1991 and the time will come when moscow will strike against Ukraine with the its age-old intention of capturing the country, subjugating the nation and erasing all vestiges of Ukrainian culture, language and religion.

Even that hasn’t been a kremlin goal that has been relegated to the past 30 or so years or the 21st or 20th centuries.

It’s been moscow’s mission for 1,000 years.

We’ve denounced the West’s decision of 80 years ago to accept russia as a trustworthy, democratic partner rather than strongly supporting the captive nations in their quest to free themselves of moscow’s yolk and become sovereign and independent.

We accepted reality that our arguments were for naught.

And then we see that the least likely contemporary national leader has uttered his own “mea culpa” or rather in French “ma faute.”

French President Emmanuel Macron admitted that France – and by association Europe and the free world – should have paid more attention to Eastern European countries that warned of the threat from russia.

Macron expressed this epiphany in a speech at the GLOBSEC forum in Bratislava, according to European Pravda and Reuters.

This is politically and historically significant because Macron has been one of the national leaders who believed in the goodness of moscow and the potential success of convincing putin to stop the war in Ukraine. He upheld this point of view even in the face of russia’s crimes against humanity in Ukraine.

Macron emphasized that there should be no division between “Old Europe” and “New Europe.” referring to the long-standing disagreements between the EU’s eastern and western members, particularly over the Russian issue.

“Some said you had missed an opportunity to shut up. I think we also lost an opportunity to listen to you. This time is over," Macron said.

He was alluding to former French President Jacques Chirac’s statement in 2003 that Eastern European states that supported the United States and Britain in their decision to invade Iraq had missed a “good opportunity to shut up.”

The French President said russia had suffered obvious failures in the war against Ukraine.

“War is far from over but one thing is clear: Ukraine won’t be conquered. We can see that what was supposed to be a ‘special operation’ is already a geopolitical failure,” Macron said.

Earlier, Macron stated that Ukraine must be provided with “tangible and reliable security guarantees.”

He also emphasized that the West should do everything possible to help Ukraine conduct an effective counteroffensive since it “gives a chance to establish a lasting peace.”

We accept your confession. As your penance, provide Ukraine will all of your offensive and defensive air, land and sea weapons.

Sunday, May 28, 2023

Ukraine Repels Massive russian missile attack on Kyiv Day

May 28 is traditionally observed in Ukraine as Kyiv Day, the spiritual and historical capital of sovereign Ukraine.

The legendary city was founded 1,541 years ago, give or take a few months. When glorious golden-domed Kyiv was established, the regions around moscow and other russian cities were bogs and swamps with croaking frogs.

Contemporary russia, itself a concept that originated in the mid-18th century, did not overlook the occasion to commemorate this anniversary.

It vindictively launched the largest drone attack against Ukraine’s capital since the start of russia’s war 15 months ago just as Kyiv was preparing to mark the anniversary. Reports say at least one person was killed.

Serhii Popko, a senior Kyiv military official, said russia launched the “most massive attack” on the capital with Iranian-made Shahed drones. The attack lasted more than five hours, with air defense reportedly shooting down more than 40 drones.

A 41-year-old man was killed and a 35-year-old woman was hospitalized when debris fell on a seven-story nonresidential building and started a fire, Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko said.

Ukraine’s Air Force said Saturday night was also record-breaking in terms of Shahed drone attacks across the country. Of the 54 drones launched, 52 were shot down by air defense systems.

In the northeastern Kharkiv province, regional Gov. Oleh Syniehubov said a 61-year-old woman and a 60-year-old man were killed in two separate shelling attacks.

A colleague and friend, Tanya Parkhomchuk, a journalist with Zerkalo Nedili and Ukrayina Moloda, whose article on current events in Ukraine will appear in the summer 2023 edition of THE UKRAINIAN QUARTERLY, described russia’s latest massive missile attack on Kyiv:

“All night, on May 28 (Kyiv Day) the orcs (pejorative word for Russians meaning hideous monster) poured hatred, a record number of Shaheds, on us and our Kyiv. Evidently, the genes of the hordes push them to commit new crimes, they do not give rest, reminding of their brutal, destructive raids on Kyiv. When churches were chosen together with gilded domes; when they robbed the houses of Kyivans, killed, mocked... And, receiving tears and curses in their wake, they took carts full of bloody loot to their Golden Horde moksha (moscow). They have no right to further defile the Earth. Their place is complete oblivion.

“Happy birthday, dear, wise, courageous, Kyiv! We love you infinitely!”

Ukraine will survive because Ukrainians – all Ukrainians from east to west and north to Crimea – will persevere and repel all russian attacks. But is it fair for Ukrainians – civilians – to endure death and destruction every day as they defend the free world from russian aggression?

Friday, May 26, 2023

It’s always been russia so Let’s not Repeat Mistakes of 1945

The current russian war against Ukraine is not a sudden, isolated act of brutality, detached from the long history of moscow’s perverted imperial hunger to invade, conquer, dominate and destroy the country and all Ukrainians. The centuries-long aggression has also not been disconnected from the long line of occupants of the kremlin’s corner office and the entire russian nation but rather has been instigated and encouraged by both.

This hard-to-fathom duration and vast national acquiescence is not lost upon the former captive nations of russian subjugation that have been warily observing russia’s invasion of Ukraine, helping their kindred nation with arms while reinforcing their borders and restocking their arsenals. Just as we have been writing about this inevitable russo-Ukraine war so too have the Eastern European nations been expecting such an explosion.

Among them is Prime Minister of Estonia Kaja Kallas, who at the recent Copenhagen Democracy Summit 2023 accused the russian people of culpability for the invasion of Ukraine.

“But it’s not just Putin’s war. The Russian people also have a responsibility – as long as territorial expansion is considered a virtue in Russia, and human lives lost are its acceptable side-effects, Russia’s aggression will sooner or later return and there can be no lasting peace in Europe,” she stated.

“Recognizing national guilt and taking personal responsibility for it is the basis for a society to have a future. It is also a basis for breaking Russia’s cycle of violence and aggression.”

The point about recognizing national guilt is well taken. Images of russia’s crimes against humanity and war crimes in Ukraine are as prevalent as those of Nazi crimes against Jews and will serve as a blatant reminder for future generations of russians of their predecessors’ inhumanity.

After visiting Bucha with Ukrainian Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko, Kallas remarked “This place is heartbreaking. The horrors of Bucha revealed to the whole world the nature of the Russian occupation, which Estonians and other countries in our region remember well from their own history. These atrocities are far from limited to Bucha.”

According to the prime minister, in addition to the fight for freedom, Ukraine must win the fight for justice.

“The russian leadership must be held accountable for the crime of aggression, genocide and crimes against humanity. Murders, rapes and deportations must be seen as tools of the russian regime in its criminal policy against the Ukrainian people,” Kallas added.

The russians’ collective national responsibility for crimes against humanity in Ukraine was also noted by an article in The Ukrainian Quarterly by Askold S. Lozynskyj, a noted Ukrainian global civic leader and writer, who said that in the past century russia has been responsible for two acts of genocide against Ukrainians.

“The recent abhorrent directive by the Moscow allegedly Christian Orthodox Church ‘to wipe Ukrainians off the face of the earth’ has been used in the past. In 1932-33 the Kremlin murdered 7-10 million Ukrainians through an imposed famine referred to as the Holodomor. A similar event except with rockets and bullets is taking place today. Fortunately, so far the numbers are not as staggering, but then the Russians do not have control of Ukrainian territory as in 1932-33,” Lozynskyj wrote.

It must be remembered that putin along with russian liberals and chauvinists are cut from the same anti-Ukrainian cloth.

Lozynskyj wrote: “Putin is not an outlier! He’s simply a muscovite! He is like the aforesaid muscovite archpriest, or the liberal dissident Russian poet, Brodsky who is not alone in his Ukrainophobia. There was the preeminent Russian dissident Oleksandr Solzhenitsyn who wrote: ‘Not the whole of Ukraine in its current formal Soviet borders is indeed Ukraine. Some regions … clearly lean more towards Russia. As for Crimea, Khrushchev’s decision to hand it over to Ukraine was totally arbitrary.’

“Solzhenitsyn's mother was Ukrainian. Does not Solzhenitsyn sound like putin? There were, are, and will be others like him. There is, of course, the russian mother whose soldier son rapes and kills innocent Ukrainian children upon her directive. Solzhenitsyn’s antisemitism was prevalent as well. After all he considered himself a great russian and that meant chauvinism and the denigration of others because that is what great russians do.”

The latest iteration of russian aggression against Ukraine exhibits the same brutality as the Soviet troops that occupied much of eastern and central Europe during the Second World War, Kallas pointed out.

While Ukraine’s Western partners have been analyzing Russian capabilities on display through more than one year of a full-scale war, Kallas said the European Union and NATO must also end what she called the “historical cycle” of Russian aggression against its neighbors.

“I’m very surprised that they haven’t changed since the Second World War,” Kallas told Newsweek in an exclusive interview at Stenbock House, the official seat of the Estonian government in Tallinn.

“The way they operate, the brutality, the atrocities; it hasn’t changed at all. And the question that I have in my mind is, how is that possible, really, in 2022 or 2023? But it is still so.”

Kallas said hoping for successful negotiations or compromise to end the war is misplaced.

“The war ends when Russia realizes it was a mistake, like they did with the (Cold War-era) war in Afghanistan. When they realize that they can’t win this war, then they’ll stop. And that’s why it’s very important that we are behind Ukraine saying that we are ready to go on as long as you, we are supporting Ukraine as long as it takes. And it’s also important for Russians to see that the will of the Ukrainians is not breakable,” she said.

Russia must be forced to accept the inevitability of its loss in Ukraine. The free world must be obviously committed to helping Ukraine defeat russia, which could then lead to internal revolution that will lead to the dismemberment of the evil empire and freedom for the scores of still enslaved peoples.

Whether the war in Ukraine has entered its final battles or it will last for decades as some demented russian leaders predict, the free world is faced with a scenario similar to the one faced by the allies in the final weeks of World War II. The story is well known. Gen. George Patton’s army was on the verge of taking Prague while the soviet red army was still days away. But the American commander was stopped by Churchill who told him that Prague was in moscow’s designated sphere of influence.

Patton was quite prophetic in his comments about russia in 1945:

“We promised the Europeans freedom. It would be worse than dishonorable not to see they have it. This might mean war with the Russians, but what of it? They have no Air Force anymore, their gasoline and ammunition supplies are low. I’ve seen their miserable supply trains; mostly wagons drawn by beaten up old horses or oxen. I’ll say this; the Third Army alone with very little help and with damned few casualties, could lick what is left of the Russians in six weeks. You mark my words. Don't ever forget them. Someday we will have to fight them and it will take six years and cost us six million lives.”

The United States and other free world countries also promised to stand with Ukraine as long as it takes and restore Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial inviolability. They are honor bound to fulfill that pledge. Ukraine must not be forced to abandon victory over russia for misguided hope for better relations with moscow.

Keep in mind the eternal warning of the 19th century Ukrainian bard Taras Shevchenko:

“Fall in love with marigolds,
but not with the Muscovites,
Because Muscovites are strange people,
They do evil to you!”

Friday, May 19, 2023

Give Ukraine F-16s!

A notable group of international politicians, legislators, civic leaders, academics and others signed open letter to President Biden insisting that Ukraine be given needed F-16 fighter jets to help with its efforts to defeat russian invaders.

The letter states:

Mr. President,

First and foremost, we would like to thank you, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, and the broad bipartisan coalition in Congress for your unwavering support for Ukraine and for the leadership that the United States has once again taken in defense of the fundamental principles of the United Nations Charter. Like you, we believe that, as General Christopher Cavoli put it so well, “Russia cannot come out of this war with victory, our future simply cannot stand it.”

We have often wished that the assistance provided to Ukraine had been faster and more extensive. However, we are well aware that you are in possession of information that we do not have, and that you have had to work hard to build the Ramstein coalition and to make it more cohesive.

We are writing to you today because we are concerned. The task that awaits the Ukrainian armed forces in the coming months is enormous. There is a risk of setbacks and partial successes. And, as General Mark Milley has repeatedly reminded us, it is always a bad idea to underestimate the military capabilities of the Russian Federation. In other words, there is no guarantee that the war will not continue beyond 2023.

As you know, General Valerii Zaluzhnyi, the Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and many Ukrainian military and political leaders believe that the supply of Western aircraft is crucial for a quick end to the war. Moreover, as Jens Stoltenberg, the Secretary General of NATO, and James Cleverly, the British Foreign Secretary, have stated, the only real guarantee of Ukraine’s security in the medium and long term is its membership of the Atlantic Organization, even if this is only possible at the end of the war. We have no doubt that a broad consensus is forming on this point. We believe that the states that blocked this process in 2008 at the NATO Summit in Bucharest, and thus bear a grave responsibility for the war in progress, will be careful not to hinder it again.

We are aware that mastering the use of modern Western aircraft requires extensive pilot training and complex logistics. But we also know that the Ukrainian soldiers, who are highly motivated, have demonstrated a remarkable capacity to learn.

As leader of the Ramstein coalition, and as president of the country that produces the aircraft that the Ukrainian military authorities want most – the F-16 – your approval is essential.

In six months’ time the Ramstein coalition must be in a position to adjudicate – in the light of the prevailing military and political situation – on the supply of these F-16s by your country and by those European countries that have them. It therefore seems essential to us that a decision be taken without delay to train around one hundred Ukrainian pilots; to assemble the logistical chain involved in the supply of a hundred or so aircraft; to establish the number of aircraft that each NATO member country could effectively supply in the fall of 2023; and to prepare those aircraft.

We thank you for doing everything in your power to achieve these objectives in the near future and assure you, Mr. President, of our highest consideration,

First signatories

Annely Akkermann, member of Parliament, former Minister of Finance, Estonia

Andrus Ansip, member of the European Parliament, former Prime Minister of Estonia

Gert-Johannes Hagemann, Major General (ret.), German Army, Berlin, Germany 

Willy Herteleer, Admiral (ret.), ex Belgian Chief of Defense

Anton Hofreiter, Chairman of the Committee on European Union Affairs of the Bundestag, Germany

Rasa Jukneviciené, Vice-President of the European Parliament, former Defense Minister, Lithuania

Roderich Kiesewetter, member of the Bundestag, representative of Foreign Affairs for the CDU/CSU-caucus, Germany

Andrius Kubilius, member of the European Parliament, former Prime Minister of Lithuania

Vytautas Landsbergis, former President of the Republic of Lithuania

Pandeli Majko, former Prime Minister of Albania

Marcos Perestrello, member of Parliament, Chair of the Defense Committee, Portugal

Karel Schwarzenberg, former Foreign Affairs Minister and vice Prime Minister of the Czech Republic

Kalev Stoicescu, member of Parliament, chairman of the National Defense Committee, Estonia

Jarosław Stróżyk, Brigadier General (ret.), Assistant Professor at the University of Wrocław, Poland

Pekka Toveri, Major General (ret.), member of Parliament, Finland

&

Michael Aastrup Jensen, member of Parliament, Denmark

Cengiz Aktar, professor of Political Science at the University of Athens

Alberto Alemanno, Jean Monnet professor of EU Law, HEC Paris, Founder of The Good Lobby

Katarina Ammitzbøll, former member of Parliament, Denmark

Martin Andler, mathematician, professor emeritus at the University of Versailles-St-Quentin, France

Antoine Arjakovsky, director of Research, Collège des Bernardins, France

Olga Artyushkina, senior Lecturer HDR in Russian Grammar and Linguistics, Jean Moulin Lyon 3 University

Anders Åslund, economist and former Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council, Sweden, and a member of the Editorial Advisory Board of The Ukrainian Quarterly

João Azevedo Castro, member of Parliament, Portugal

Christine Baron, professor of Comparative Literature, University of Poitiers, France

Kris Beckers, Honorary Consul of Ukraine in Belgium

Martine Benoit, professor of History of Ideas-German studies, University of Lille, France

Gérard Bensussan, philosopher, professor Emeritus at the University of Strasbourg, France

Florian Bieber, professor of Southeast European History and Politics, Centre for Southeast European Studies, University of Graz, Austria

Michał Bilewicz, associate professor of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Poland

Pierre Bouchat, assistant professor of social psychology at the University of Lorraine, France

Alain Bourges, videographer, writer, retired senior art teacher, Ecole Européenne Supérieure d’Art de Bretagne, Rennes, France

John Bowis, former member of the European Parliament, former member of the Parliament of the United Kingdom

Yordan Bozhilov, director of the Sofia Security Forum, former Deputy Defense Minister of Bulgaria

Justina Budginaité-Froehly, political scientist, Germany

Patricia Caillé, lecturer in the Information and Communication Department, University of Strasbourg, France

Michel Caillouët, former Ambassador of the European Union, France

Enver Can, founding President of the Ilham Tohti Initiative, Germany

Marco Cappato, former member of the European Parliament, Italy

Paulo Casaca, former member of the Portuguese Parliament, former member of the European Parliament

Leo M. Chalupa, professor, School of Medicine, George Washington University; Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science”, USA

Peter Cmorej, member of Parliament, Slovakia

Yves Cohen, historian, director of studies at EHESS, France

Dominique Colas, professor emeritus of Political Science, Sciences Po, Paris, France

Dorota Dakowska, professor of political science at Sciences Po Aix, France

Christophe D’Aloisio, researcher affiliated to the Research Institute Religions, Spiritualities, Cultures, Societies (RSCS, UCLouvain), director of the Institute of Orthodox Theology in Brussels, Belgium

Pierre d’Argent, professor of International Law, University of Louvain, member of the Institute of International Law, Belgium

Louis Daubresse, associate researcher at the Institut de Recherche sur le Cinéma et l’Audiovisuel and the Fondation Balzan, PhD in film and audiovisual studies, France

Julia David, associate member of the Institute of Modern and Contemporary History (CNRS/ENS), France

Mark Demesmaeker, senator, chair of the Committee of Transversal Affairs, Belgium

Sébastien Denis, professor, History & Film Studies, University of Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, France

Massimiliano Di Pasquale, associate researcher at the Gino Germani Foundation, Italy

Boris Dittrich, Senator, Netherlands

Jean-Marc Dreyfus, historian, lecturer at the University of Manchester, UK

André Dumoulin, honorary lecturer, University of Liege, Belgium

Olivier Dupuis, former member of the European Parliament, Belgium

Emmanuel Dupuy, president of the Institute for Prospective and Security in Europe (IPSE), France

Normunds Dzintars, member of Parliament, Latvia

Marc Elie, research fellow at the CNRS, Deputy Director of the Center for Russian, Caucasian and Central European Studies – Cercec, France

Nino Evgenidze, executive director Economic Policy Research Center (EPRC), Georgia

Marta Farion, president, Kyiv-Mohyla Foundation of America, and a member of the Executive Board of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America

Penelope Faulkner, vice-President of Quê Me: Action for Democracy in Vietnam, France

Andrej Findor, associate professor at the Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia

Claude Forest, lecturer and researcher in economics and sociology of cinema at the Sorbonne Paris 3 University, France

Céline Gailleurd, lecturer, filmmaker, University of Paris 8

Natalia Gamalova, professor of Russian Language and Literature, Department of Slavic Studies, University of Lyon 3, France

Vitaliano Gemelli, former member of the European Parliament, Italy

Julie Gerber, doctor of Comparative Literature, lecturer at the Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3, France

Mridula Ghosh, senior Lecturer of International Relations, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy; Board Chair, East European Development Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine

Thorniké Gordadzé, former Minister of European and Euro-Atlantic Integration of Georgia, lecturer at Paris Institute of Political Studies, Sciences Po, France

Svetlana Gorshenina, historian, art historian, historiographer and specialist on Central Asia, director of research at CNRS Eur’Orbem, Université Paris-Sorbonne, France

Nicolas Gosset, defense analyst, research fellow Russia/Eurasia at the Royal Higher Institute for Defense, Brussels, Belgium

Iegor Gran, writer, France

Markéta Gregorova, member of the European Parliament, Czech Republic

Gustav Gressel, senior policy fellow with the Wider Europe Programme at the European Council on Foreign Relations, Germany

Tomasz Grzegorz Grosse, professor, University of Warsaw, head of Department of European Union Policies at the Institute of European Studies, Editor-in-Chief of the International Analyses quarterly, Poland

Jarosław Gryz, professor at War Studies University, Poland

Jeanyves Guérin, professor of French literature at the Sorbonne nouvelle University, France

Fernando Adolfo Gutiérrez Díaz de Otazu, member of Parliament, Spain

Christophe Hansen, member of the European Parliament, Luxemburg

Atte Harjanne, member of Parliament, Finland

Rebecca Harms, former member of the European Parliament and Co-chair of the Green Parlamentary Group, Germany

Patrick Hassenteufel, professor of Political Science, Université Paris-Saclay (UVSQ), Sciences Po Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France

Pavel Havlicek, research fellow at the Association for International Affairs (AMO), Czech Republic

Oleksandr Havrylenko, professor at the V. N. Karazin National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Joseph Henrotin, research fellow at the Institut de Stratégie Comparée, Belgium/France

Richard Herzinger, columnist, Berlin, Germany

Maryana Hnyp, professor of Social Ethics, Ateneo de Manila University; president of the

European Network on Religion and Belief, Belgium

Marie Holzman, sinologist, president of Solidarité Chine

Ulrich Huygevelde, coordinator of the Center Géopolis, Belgium

Mārcis Jencītis, member of Parliament, Latvia

Mario Kadastik, member of Parliament, Estonia

Christian Kaunert, professor of International Security Policy, Dublin City University and University of South Wales

André Klarsfeld, deputy chair of the NPO “Pour l’Ukraine, pour leur liberté et la nôtre !”, retired university professor, France

Jurģis Klotiņš, member of Parliament, Latvia

Miro Kollár, member of Parliament, Slovakia

Gašper Koprivsek, founder and director of Elysium Public Affairs, Slovenia

Philip Krämer, member of the Bundestag, Germany

Péter Krekó, senior lecturer and director of the Political Capital Institute, Political Psychology, Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary

Eerik-Niiles Kross, member of Parliament, former Director of Intelligence, Estonia

Yauheni Kryzhanouski, researcher, University of Strasbourg, associate professor at European Humanities University, Vilnius

Robert Kwiatkowski, member of Parliament, Poland

Per Larsen, member of Parliament, Denmark

Gérard Lauton, emeritus assistant professor, member of the NPO “Pour l’Ukraine, pour leur liberté et la nôtre !”, France

Diogo Leão, member of Parliament, Portugal

Aurélie Ledoux, lecturer, film studies, University of Paris Nanterre, France

Mathieu Lericq, Lecturer, Film studies, University Paris 8 Vincennes Saint-Denis, France

Ophir Levy, associate professor, Film Studies, Université Paris 8 Vincennes Saint-Denis, France

Šarūnas Liekis, professor of Politics and dean of the Faculty of Politics and Diplomacy at Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania

Jarno Limnell, member of Parliament, Finland

Sylvie Lindeperg, professor at the University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne and emeritus member of the Institut Universitaire de France

Jonathan Littell, writer, Goncourt Prize, France

Ramon Loik, security politics analyst, Estonian Academy of Security Sciences, former adviser to the Estonian Minister of Defense

Raimundas Lopata, member of Parliament, director of the Institute of International Relations and Political Science at Vilnius University, Lithuania

Mihhail Lotman, former member of Parliament, professor emeritus at the Tallinn University, professor at the University of Tartu, Estonia

Lubomyr Luciuk, professor of Political Science and Economics, Royal Military College of Canada

Jaak Madison, member of the European Parliament, Estonia

Paul Robert Magocsi, permanent fellow, Royal Society of Canada—Academy of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences

Damien Marguet, associate professor, co-Head of Film Studies Department, Université Paris 8 Vincennes Saint-Denis, France

Jean Mariani, professor emeritus, Neurosciences and Gerosciences, Faculty of Medicine Sorbonne University, France

Alain Maskens, physician, oncologist, founder and former medical coordinator of the European Organization for Cooperation in Cancer Prevention Studies (ECP), Belgium

Marie-Claude Maurel, director of Studies at EHESS – École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Centre d’études russe, caucasien et centre-européen, France

Frédéric Mauro, lawyer at the Brussels bar, associate researcher at the Institute for International and Strategic Relations (IRIS), Paris, France

Rachel Mazuy, Associate researcher at the Institut d’Histoire du Temps Présent, lecturer at Sciences Po Paris, France

Alvydas Medalinskas, political analyst, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, former chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Lithuanian Parliament

Alexandre Melnik, professor at ICN Business School, expert and consultant in geopolitics, France

Nona Mikhelidze, senior fellow at the Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI) in Rome, Italy

Emmanuel Morucci, doctor in Sociology, president of CECI (Cercle Europe Citoyennetés et identités), France

Alexander Motyl, professor of political science, Rutgers University-Newark, United States

Boris Najman, associate professor and researcher in Economics at University Paris East Créteil

Laure Neumayer, political scientist, lecturer at the University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne and senior researcher at the European Centre for Sociology and Political Science in Paris, France

Olevs Nikers, president of the Baltic Security Foundation, Latvia

Alexis Nuselovici, professor of General and Comparative Literature at the University of Aix-Marseille, France

Lydia Obolensky, professor of Russian Language and Literature, Belgium

Ong Thong Hoeung, writer, survivor of the Khmer Rouge re-education camps, Belgium

Peter Osuský, vice-chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Slovakian Parliament

Doris Pack, president of EPP Women, president of the Robert Schuman Institute, former member of the European Parliament and the Bundestag, Germany

Carmelo Palma, journalist, Director of Strade-on-line, Italy

Franck Petiteville, professor of Political Science, Grenoble Institute of Political Studies, France

Jan Pieklo, Polish ambassador to Ukraine (2016-2019)

Nicoletta Pirozzi, head of EU Programme and Institutional Relations Manager at Istituto Affari Internazionali, Italy

Andrzej Podraza, professor, head of the Chair of International Relations and Security, Catholic University of Lublin, Poland; visiting fellow, University of Notre Dame, USA

Henn Põlluaas, member of Parliament, Estonia

Bohdan Prots, associate professor, Danube-Carpathian Programme and State Museum of Natural History, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine

Jean-Paul Pylypczuk, director of the publication “La parole ukrainienne”, France

Eva Quistorp, theologian, writer, former member of the European Parliament, Berlin, Germany

Pierre Raiman, secretary of the NPO “Pour l’Ukraine, pour leur liberté et la nôtre !”, France

Sylvie Rollet, emeritus professor, chairwoman of the NPO “Pour l’Ukraine, pour leur liberté et la nôtre !”

Bronis Ropé, member of the European Parliament, Lithuania

Marie-Claude San Juan, writer and blogger, France

Andrei Sannikov, chairman of the European Belarus Foundation. Deputy Foreign Minister of Belarus (1995-1996), presidential candidate 2010, former Prisoner of Consciousness

Anton Shekhovtsov, director of the Centre for Democratic Integrity, Austria

Sjoerd Sjoerdsma, member of Parliament, Netherlands

Ivan Štefanec, member of the European Parliament, Slovakia

Wally Struys, professor emeritus, defence economist, Royal Military Academy, Belgium

Raúl Suevos, colonel (ret), former director of communication at the Eurocorps and former commander of the multinational HQ Battalion of Eurocorps, Spain

Marcin Święcicki, former Minister of Foreign Economic Co-operation, former mayor of Warsaw, Poland

Igor Taro, member of Parliament, Estonia

Ewa M. Thompson, professor of Slavic Studies Emerita, Rice University, USA

Nathalie Tocci, honorary professor at the University of Tübingen, director of the Istituto Affari Internazionali, Italy

Patrizia Tosini, associate professor of History of Modern Art, Roma Tre University, Italy

Florian Trauner, Jean Monnet chair at the Institute for European Studies of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), visiting professor at the College of Europe, Belgium

Andreas Umland, analyst at the Stockholm Centre for Eastern European Studies

Jacques Vallin, director of research Emeritus, INED, Condorcet Campus, France

Karl Vanlouwe, member of the Flemish Parliament, Senator, Belgium

Maïrbek Vatchagaev, Chechen historian and political analyst of the North Caucasus at the Jamestown Foundation, co-editor of the journal “Caucasus Survey”

Sarah Whitmore, reader in Politics, Faculty Research Ethics Officer, School of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom

Kataryna Wolczuk, professor of Political science, Centre for Russian, European and Eurasian Studies (CREES), School of Government, University of Birmingham, UK

Miroslav Žiak, former member of Parliament, Slovakia

Christian Rocca, Linkiesta Editorial Director, Italy

Saturday, April 29, 2023

Chornobyl – russia’s Nuclear Terror in Ukraine

Regarded as the world’s most dangerous nuclear accident, Chornobyl stands out in history as another example of russia’s premeditated or negligent murder in Ukraine. Ukrainians and other people around the world suffered as a result of this catastrophe in a small town north of Kyiv on April 26, 1986. Soviet russian officials quickly learned of this but chose not to inform local residents and the global community. Consequently, children in and around the Ukrainian capital continued with their daily outdoor activities while fine particles of nuclear dust descended on them. In time, this dangerous powder reached western Ukraine, north to Belarus and other regions of the planet.

A decade later, when I was an adjunct at Hofstra University, I wrote an article about this disaster for my students’ periodical. I’d like to share that article with you on the 37th anniversary of the russia’s typical deadly malfeasance in Ukraine.

https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/review?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:3d1be25a-e3fe-3381-8bb4-db9b18795fb9

Wednesday, April 12, 2023

russians Behead Ukrainian Soldiers

What do you say about a culture that practices beheading of prisoners of war? We were aghast to see on video Islamic State cutthroats perform this heinous crime.

The bloody list of war crimes committed in Ukraine by invading russian murderers at least since February 24, 2022 if not longer, has shocked the global community. Unarmed civilians – men, women and children – have fallen into their crosshairs. And so have prisoners of war. For russians, it matters not who they kill in Ukraine. If they speak Ukrainian or if they love their native Ukrainian land, they are in mortal danger at the hands of russian killers.

We’ve barely digested watching the incredible coldblooded killing of a Ukrainian POW after he replied “Glory to Ukraine” to a group of russian killers when we learned of the beheading – decapitation of the head, the chopping off of the head – of Ukrainian POWs. There’s really no clean way to say this.

I heard of this yesterday in a colleague’s LinkedIn post, in which he said that he had mustered the courage to watch the video and listen to the horrific screams as russians beheaded the Ukrainian soldiers. I daresay that few people would have the moral strength to watch that clip.

Today newsmedia began reporting this latest russian crime.

Two videos appear to be of separate events – one of them may have been filmed very recently, while the other, from the amount of foliage seen on the ground, looks like it was filmed during the summer of 2022.

The first video, which was posted to a pro-Russian social media channel on April 8, 2023, was purportedly filmed by Russian mercenaries from the Wagner group and appears to show the beheaded corpses of two Ukrainian soldiers lying on the ground next to a destroyed military vehicle.

In the video, CNN and others reported, a voice can be heard, behind the camera, the sound seemingly distorted to prevent the speaker’s identification.

“(The armored vehicle) got f**ked by a mine,” the voice, speaking Russian, says.

Apparently referring to the bodies on the ground, the voice, laughing, continues, “They killed them. Someone came up to them. They came up to them and cut their heads off.” The dead soldiers also appear to have had their hands cut off, CNN reported.

Russian social media accounts say the video was shot near Bakhmut in eastern Ukraine, which has been the scene of the war’s fiercest fighting for many months, with Wagner fighters heavily involved.

The second video, which was posted on Twitter and is heavily blurred, looks to have been filmed during the summer of 2022 because of the amount of plant life on the ground. It shows a Russian fighter using a knife to cut off the head of a Ukrainian soldier. A voice at the beginning of the video suggests the victim might have still been alive when the attack began.

Ukrainian officials compared russia to the Islamic State and called on the International Criminal Court to investigate after a video emerged online showing apparent russian soldiers filming themselves beheading a Ukrainian captive with a knife, reported Reuters.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy today condemned as “beasts” those who purportedly beheaded Ukrainian soldiers shown in two videos that emerged on social media in the past week.

Zelenskyy vowed those behind the purported atrocities would be held accountable. “There is something that no one in the world can ignore: how easily these beasts kill,” he said in a video message. “We are not going to forget anything. Neither are we going to forgive the murderers. There will be legal responsibility for everything. The defeat of terror is necessary,” he said.

Dariia Zarivna, adviser to the Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, said today the videos are part of a psychological operation “aimed at intimidation.”

“It completely dehumanizes and demonstrates the essence of a terrorist country,” she said of the videos. “But it is important to understand the purpose. This is a PSYOP [psychological operation] aimed at intimidation. The target audience is not only Ukraine, but also Western societies,” Zarivna reasoned.

“It doesn’t work on us, though. The Russians are afraid of this, but not us.”

What do you say about a national culture that invades a neighbor and commits incredible evident crimes against humanity and then flaunts them on social media? What do you say about a national culture that kills prisoners of war, unarmed men, women and children, destroys their churches, libraries and infrastructure? What do you say about a national culture that tolerates these war crimes? What do you say about the brutal, terrorist russians? Think about that the next time you network with a russian businessman, academician or government official. Think about that the next time reach for



russian vodka or other made-in-russia product in your local store.

Saturday, March 25, 2023

The Abomination of Kidnapping and Beating Children

Beating defenseless children is probably one of the vilest crimes in society. It is categorically condemned by governments, courts, religions and people of good will.

Not only has russia’s führer putin been labeled a war criminal for kidnapping Ukrainian children and forcibly taking them to russia, his evil, depraved minions have been beating and torturing them for saying “Slava Ukrayini” – Glory to Ukraine.

According to the Daily Telegraph UK, russian authorities are beating Ukrainian children as they attempt to “re-educate them” to become loyal russians and to forget their parents and heritage, said one of more than a dozen teenagers freed from moscow-run youth facilities after months of negotiation.

The parents of the children transported to a youth camp on the Black Sea peninsula last year managed to bring their children back to Ukraine, the newspaper reported. The children, mostly teenagers, were living in russia-occupied area of the Kherson and Kharkiv regions when local education authorities suggested sending them to a summer camp in Crimea, which has been controlled by russia since 2014.

Save Ukraine, the charity that organized the evacuation, said it helped some parents to travel to Crimea, via Poland, belarus and russia to retrieve their children. As expected, parents and children, who were seeing their mothers and fathers for the first time in months, were seen hugging and kissing as they arrived in Kyiv.

One boy spoke of his mistreatment during a television interview. The teenager, who was not identified, said children from Kherson were punished for expressing pro-Ukrainian views.

“We will take you to an orphanage, you will sit there and understand everything,” the boy said a security officer had told him and other teenagers. He also said he saw a bruise on the back of a teenage girl that had been caused by a stick used by the officer to beat them.

The boy added that the camp’s director had told him his parents had given him up for adoption. Distraught, he called his mother, who called camp officials to tell them she had done no such thing. However, administrators allegedly told her: “You’re not going to take them anyway. They will be children of russia.”

Those who returned to Ukraine have spoken about the attempts to re-educate the youths. At some camps, they were forced to learn by heart and sing the russian national anthem and taught that Ukraine was part of russia.

The US State Department said there is mounting evidence that russia’s actions reveals the kremlin’s aims to deny and suppress Ukraine’s identity, history, and culture, which is an act of genocide. “The devastating impacts of putin’s war on Ukraine’s children will be felt for generations,” the State Department said.

At least 6,000 children from Ukraine have attended russian “re-education” camps in the past year, with several hundred held there for weeks or months beyond their scheduled return date, according to a new report published in the US, The Guardian of Great Britain reported. These places focus on brainwashing, torture, punishment and intimidation in order to change the youth’s mentality. The Office of the Ukrainian Prosecutor General said in December 2022 that nearly 800 had died or disappeared during the process of deportation.

Russia has also unnecessarily expedited the adoption and fostering of children from Ukraine in what could constitute a war crime, the Yale Humanitarian Research Lab report found. The report was funded by the State Department.

Every day reveals another detestable crime committed by russia. Its so-called soldiers are incompetent so they turn to bombing residential buildings, energy infrastructures, kidnapping children and killing and raping civilians and their offspring. The gallows is too merciful for Russians.